<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>rss.livelink.posts-in-node</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/</link>
    <description>Cisco Community</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Community</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-21T00:33:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WS-C2960XR Failover Timeout</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ws-c2960xr-failover-timeout/m-p/4390410#M503976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both server and thin client are enable teaming for 2 network port Active-Active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And use port channel to connect cisco switch&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface Port-channel9&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;description Link To SGPSRYPAS-SW02-005 (51) FO Link&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport trunk allowed vlan 351,352&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport mode trunk&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface Port-channel11&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;description SRYTC-1153&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport access vlan 351&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport mode access&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;interface Port-channel12&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;description SRYTC-1154&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport access vlan 351&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;switchport mode access&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and Switch enable spanning tree:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree portfast edge default&lt;BR /&gt;spanning-tree extend system-id&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:27:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ws-c2960xr-failover-timeout/m-p/4390410#M503976</guid>
      <dc:creator>NguyenHung2238</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T00:27:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Optimize for Motion and Video" option has disappeared</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/quot-optimize-for-motion-and-video-quot-option-has-disappeared/m-p/4390409#M4299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;in Webex Meetings, the option to "Optimize for Motion and Video" when sharing no longer appears. Has this feature been deleted or is something wrong with my installation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/quot-optimize-for-motion-and-video-quot-option-has-disappeared/m-p/4390409#M4299</guid>
      <dc:creator>CompCoach</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T00:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Community Live Event- Tour of the Real-Time Monitoring Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-voice-and-video/community-live-event-tour-of-the-real-time-monitoring-tool/bc-p/4390406#M250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there any chance this was recorded? I was really looking forward to it, but I missed it due to events going on at work&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/collaboration-voice-and-video/community-live-event-tour-of-the-real-time-monitoring-tool/bc-p/4390406#M250</guid>
      <dc:creator>Snoogie2563</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T00:10:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Endpoint Custom Attributes to control network access (DACL or VLAN)?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/how-to-use-endpoint-custom-attributes-to-control-network-access/m-p/4390405#M566814</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is demonstrated with &lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-ers-api-examples/ta-p/3622623" target="_self"&gt;ISE ERS APIs&lt;/A&gt; :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI style="list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 1px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-ers-api-examples/ta-p/3622623#toc-hId--972098705" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Create an Endpoint with Custom Attributes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 30px; margin-bottom: 1px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-ers-api-examples/ta-p/3622623#toc-hId-1644496847" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Define ISE Endpoint Custom Attributes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 30px; margin-bottom: 1px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/ise-ers-api-examples/ta-p/3622623#toc-hId--162957616" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Create an Endpoint with Custom Attributes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/how-to-use-endpoint-custom-attributes-to-control-network-access/m-p/4390405#M566814</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-21T00:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Move Floating Panel When Sharing Content</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390404#M4298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1175410" target="_blank"&gt;LauraHesselberg43252&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd love to see a video on how you did this. &amp;nbsp;It has me beaten. &amp;nbsp;Maybe it's a feature that hasn't been implemented on macOS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:41:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390404#M4298</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedNectar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:41:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Centralized Reporting for TrustSec SGACLs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/centralized-reporting-for-trustsec-sgacls/m-p/4390402#M566813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a pain to do on IOS/IOS-XE compared to the way we can modify each logs severity level on the ASA. You can potentially handle this through a tcl script to rewrite the severity level to 5, or another value of your choosing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See this page for more information on the process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://flylib.com/books/en/2.286.1/modifying_log_messages.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://flylib.com/books/en/2.286.1/modifying_log_messages.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:34:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-access-control/centralized-reporting-for-trustsec-sgacls/m-p/4390402#M566813</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien Miller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:34:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RV345P Is Blocking TLS Traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-support-community/rv345p-is-blocking-tls-traffic/m-p/4390401#M366</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes - sent via PM.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-support-community/rv345p-is-blocking-tls-traffic/m-p/4390401#M366</guid>
      <dc:creator>db77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DHCP Pool on VLAN with PC fixed address</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dhcp-pool-on-vlan-with-pc-fixed-address/m-p/4390400#M349788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to configure on a Catalyst 1000 switch a DHCP Server on network 192.168.1.0/24 with a fixed IP address of 192.168.1.10 for a PC Network with a specific MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the steps I followed :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;1) Type commands on Switch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;conf t

ip dhcp pool 192.168.1.0
	network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
	default-router 192.168.1.1
	exit

int vlan 1
	ip address pool 192.168.1.0
	exit

ip dhcp pool PC
	host 192.168.1.10
	hardware-address 01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx
	exit

do sh ip dhcp pool&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;2) Check on Switch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;Pool 192.168.1.0 :
 Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
 Total addresses                : 254
 Leased addresses               : 0
 Excluded addresses             : 1
 Pending event                  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current index        IP address range                    Leased/Excluded/Total
 192.168.1.1          192.168.1.1      - 192.168.1.254     0     / 1     / 254

Pool PC :
 Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
 Total addresses                : 1
 Leased addresses               : 1
 Excluded addresses             : 1
 Pending event                  : none
 0 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current index        IP address range                    Leased/Excluded/Total
 192.168.1.10         192.168.1.10     - 192.168.1.10      1     / 1     / 1&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;3) Type commands on Switch&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;do clear ip dhcp binding *&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;4) Type commands on PC&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ipconfig /release &amp;amp;&amp;amp; ipconfig /renew&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No IP delivered&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;5) Type commands on Switch&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;do sh interfaces&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;6) Check&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;Vlan1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is EtherSVI, address is XXXX.XXXX.XXXX (bia XXXX.XXXX.XXXX)
Internet address will be autoconfigured from local DHCP pool
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not supported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:22:34, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 2 interface resets
1704 unknown protocol drops
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
GigabitEthernet1/0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is XXXX.XXXX.XXXX (bia XXXX.XXXX.XXXX)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:01:18, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 3000 bits/sec, 3 packets/sec
34620 packets input, 8502653 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 4427 broadcasts (3590 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 3590 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
62613 packets output, 37744232 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;7) Type commands on Switch&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;int gigabitEthernet 1/0/1
	shutdown
	no shutdown
	exit
	
do sh ip dhcp binding&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_smiling-face-with-sunglasses" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt; Check&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address      Client-ID/              Lease expiration        Type       State      Interface
                Hardware address/
                User name
192.168.1.10     01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx       Infinite                Manual     Selecting  Unknown&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;9) Type commands on PC&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ipconfig /renew&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;No IP delivered&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;10) Type commands on Switch&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ip dhcp pool 192.168.1.0
	network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
	default-router 192.168.1.1
	address 192.168.1.10 hardware-address 01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx

&lt;STRONG&gt;% Address 192.168.1.10 is not valid in this pool.&lt;/STRONG&gt;

	exit

int vlan 1
	ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
	exit&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;11) Type commands on PC&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ipconfig /renew&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;=&amp;gt; Got 192.168.1.3&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;U&gt;12) Type commands on Switch and Check&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;(config)#do sh ip dhcp binding&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address      Client-ID/              Lease expiration        Type       State      Interface
                Hardware address/
                User name
192.168.1.1      XXXX.XXXX.XXXX          Apr 22 2021 12:57 AM    Automatic  Active     Vlan1
192.168.1.3      01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx       Apr 22 2021 12:58 AM    Automatic  Active     Vlan1
192.168.1.10     01xx.xxxx.xxxx.xx       Infinite                Manual     Selecting  Unknown

&lt;STRONG&gt;(config)#do sh ip dhcp pool&lt;/STRONG&gt;

Pool 192.168.1.0 :
 Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
 Total addresses                : 254
 Leased addresses               : 2
 Excluded addresses             : 1
 Pending event                  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current index        IP address range                    Leased/Excluded/Total
 192.168.1.4          192.168.1.1      - 192.168.1.254     4     / 3     / 254

Pool PC :
 Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
 Total addresses                : 1
 Leased addresses               : 1
 Excluded addresses             : 1
 Pending event                  : none
 0 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current index        IP address range                    Leased/Excluded/Total
 192.168.1.10         192.168.1.10     - 192.168.1.10      1     / 1     / 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I have an IP address but not using the one that is matching to the correct fixed pool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dhcp-pool-on-vlan-with-pc-fixed-address/m-p/4390400#M349788</guid>
      <dc:creator>victorc7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XGPON vs. 10G Switching Network in a very large campus network design competition</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/other-network-architecture/xgpon-vs-10g-switching-network-in-a-very-large-campus-network/m-p/4390399#M202057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am engaging a very large new smart campus (around 10 sqm, 20 large buildings, 2 train stations, multiple bus stations, and lots of audio visual devices) network design competition recently. Some system integrator proposed the Corning One GPON/XGPON as the network backbone to serve all business and applications there. I understand Cisco also has Catalyst PON product. However, I prefer our "3-tier" campus network architecture but I need your brain to help me fight back on the proposed XGPON solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any good reasons that I may include those into my presentation to highlight the benefits and need of the 3-tier campus network architecture vs. the 2-tier GPON service model? Any comments or documents&amp;nbsp;(I read the Lippis's study report before) are welcome.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/other-network-architecture/xgpon-vs-10g-switching-network-in-a-very-large-campus-network/m-p/4390399#M202057</guid>
      <dc:creator>ezisaac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: connect 1GB SFP on Catalyst 3750 to Mellanox SN 2100</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/connect-1gb-sfp-on-catalyst-3750-to-mellanox-sn-2100/m-p/4390398#M503975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Reading the &lt;A href="https://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_eth_switches/PB_SN2100.pdf" target="_self"&gt;data/spec sheet for the Mellanox&lt;/A&gt;, the switch supports a minimum of 10 Gbps.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/connect-1gb-sfp-on-catalyst-3750-to-mellanox-sn-2100/m-p/4390398#M503975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Any way to add new moderators to a team if the original moderator is unavailable?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/any-way-to-add-new-moderators-to-a-team-if-the-original/m-p/4390397#M4297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can do this via the API:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://developer.webex.com/docs/api/v1/memberships/update-a-membership" target="_blank"&gt;https://developer.webex.com/docs/api/v1/memberships/update-a-membership&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have someone who is a full admin with the skills that should work.&amp;nbsp; Otherwise, I would open a TAC case.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 23:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/any-way-to-add-new-moderators-to-a-team-if-the-original/m-p/4390397#M4297</guid>
      <dc:creator>sknoop1971</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T23:01:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WIFI 6 solution - Controller - licensing and support</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wifi-6-solution-controller-licensing-and-support/m-p/4390396#M228542</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;LI-USER uid="1162274"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does Cisco Provide any cloud management for Wireless APs which eliminate the need of physical controller?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/enterprise-networks/mobility-express/solution-overview-c22-741355.html" target="_self"&gt;Cisco Mobility Express&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:58:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wifi-6-solution-controller-licensing-and-support/m-p/4390396#M228542</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:58:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonjour traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390395#M24162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Infact I am not sure it is Bonjour or not&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didnt inspect the packet. All I see is a traffic to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;224.0.0.251:5353.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I didnt see any setting for mDNS or Avahi in my switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I concentrated on Bonjour, maybe I am wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390395#M24162</guid>
      <dc:creator>akanarya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Configuration of C9105AXI</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/configuration-of-c9105axi/m-p/4390394#M228541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, but I've taken a look through a lot of material, and still can't figure it out. &amp;nbsp;The WAP is undiscoverable on Cisco Air Provision and GUI and via IP, but I can successfully ping the WAP. &amp;nbsp;Is there a step I am missing to enable the CiscoAirProvision-xxxx to make itself visible as a WIFI network?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:56:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/configuration-of-c9105axi/m-p/4390394#M228541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spragm2570</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:56:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Team Meeting Timing Out/Ending?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/team-meeting-timing-out-ending/m-p/4390393#M4296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As long as the host remains in the meeting, you should be fine.&amp;nbsp; I have accidentally left meetings running overnight.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are a couple of options to be aware of under Common Settings, but if the host is present, you should be good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN&gt;Automatically end meetings if there is only one participant (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;I&gt;Meetings, Training and Events&lt;/I&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"When there is no host, automatically end the meeting after XXX"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/team-meeting-timing-out-ending/m-p/4390393#M4296</guid>
      <dc:creator>sknoop1971</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:54:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: copy  IOS from router to tftp : Error</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/copy-ios-from-router-to-tftp-error/m-p/4390392#M503974</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;LI-USER uid="580579"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="5"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;%Error reading flash:c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE3 (&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;Is a directory&lt;/FONT&gt;)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please learn to read the error message.&amp;nbsp; The error message is staring there in front of you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco classic IOS cannot copy the entire directory.&amp;nbsp; You need to go into the directory and copy each file out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively, you can archive the entire directory and copy the archive file.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The best method is to go to the Cisco website and download the file because you can verify if the file downloaded is corrupt.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Again, &lt;EM&gt;why would anyone go to this much trouble to download a very buggy 12.2(55)SE3 is, to say the least, amusing&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/copy-ios-from-router-to-tftp-error/m-p/4390392#M503974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:53:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco CLI Analyzer RSA key verification failing everytime</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/cisco-cli-analyzer-rsa-key-verification-failing-everytime/m-p/4390391#M479</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Luke. Thanks for using Cisco CLI Analyzer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are on a Windows machine and these devices were working prior to version 3.6.7, it's likely due to the fact that we updated the version of ssh-keyscan included with Cisco CLI Analyzer in order to address some security vulnerabilities. With the upgrade of ssh-keyscan, several dated KEX Algorithms were deprecated and are no longer recognized as valid when doing the handshake for host key verification. This can pose a problem for older Cisco hardware.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are planning to include a feature to bypass this warning automatically in release 3.6.8 of Cisco CLI Analyzer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/cisco-cli-analyzer-rsa-key-verification-failing-everytime/m-p/4390391#M479</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Hardin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The above-mentioned steps are</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-5508-replace-primary-unit-in-ha-pair/m-p/4390390#M228540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for sharing your experience with us after the move.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-5508-replace-primary-unit-in-ha-pair/m-p/4390390#M228540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos Rogerio Souza Santos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: # REGEX in CISCO iOS, iOS XE #</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/regex-in-cisco-ios-ios-xe/m-p/4390389#M349787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"grep" option only works for Nexus OS.&amp;nbsp; The bug I've pointed out is for IOS-XE.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/regex-in-cisco-ios-ios-xe/m-p/4390389#M349787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: forwarding message with attachment</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/forwarding-message-with-attachment/m-p/4390388#M4295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Forwarding of attachments from one space to another is not a supported feature at this time.&amp;nbsp; I believe it is a roadmap item.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/forwarding-message-with-attachment/m-p/4390388#M4295</guid>
      <dc:creator>sknoop1971</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:47:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Catalyst 9300 and extended VLANs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/catalyst-9300-and-extended-vlans/m-p/4390387#M503973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I'm currently running &lt;U&gt;VTP version 1 or 2&lt;/U&gt; on my network and I have a 9300 switch in Client mode, I change to Server mode and create an extended VLAN, then go back to Client mode, &lt;U&gt;will the revision number increment&lt;/U&gt;? I can't confirm but I don't believe it changes the revision number since extended VLANs are not propagated with VTP versions 1 or 2. Can anyone please confirm this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/catalyst-9300-and-extended-vlans/m-p/4390387#M503973</guid>
      <dc:creator>nat8506</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:45:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change personal room link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-user-blogs/change-personal-room-link/ba-p/4390386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Initially, this account was used for business so I used my work email, now that I am no longer employed with that agency, I would like to continue with the account but remove my previous employer's name from my personal room. How do I do that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-user-blogs/change-personal-room-link/ba-p/4390386</guid>
      <dc:creator>ms_smoore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:44:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automate personal room creation?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/automate-personal-room-creation/m-p/4390383#M4294</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Navigate to your Webex meetings site administration and go to &lt;STRONG&gt;Common Settings&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Search for "&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Enable Personal Room (When enabled, you can turn this on or off for individual users)&lt;/STRONG&gt;" and check the box to enable for everyone by default&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/automate-personal-room-creation/m-p/4390383#M4294</guid>
      <dc:creator>sknoop1971</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E164 dial plan----outbound calls to PSTN</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/e164-dial-plan-outbound-calls-to-pstn/m-p/4390382#M396529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, we are unable to call numbers in US because our telco is saying we are sending 11 digits to them (instead of 10). My senior staff is away&amp;nbsp; so I am trying to figure this out. We are using e164 dial plan----and using mask with +1XXXXXXXXXX number&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-user dials LD number to US&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-TP is matched -9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX we add + and discard 9 So number becomes +1XXXXXXXXXX format&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3-RP is matched--+.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4-RL to PSTN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5-RL points to SLRG to PSTN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6-SLRG hows called number as +1XXXXXXXXXX&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;at what point or where exactly, we should be localizing the number for PSTN? It seems right now the number going out to PSTN is 1XXXXXXXXXX.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/e164-dial-plan-outbound-calls-to-pstn/m-p/4390382#M396529</guid>
      <dc:creator>G3261</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCvb87210 - Need to increase timeout for WLC Configuration Archive - 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvb87210-need-to-increase-timeout-for-wlc-configuration/m-p/4390381#M12138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In PRIME, In the list devices, edit the device and try changing the SSH timeout to a higher time. This could be a solution. It worked for me with a WLC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:18:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvb87210-need-to-increase-timeout-for-wlc-configuration/m-p/4390381#M12138</guid>
      <dc:creator>juancho386</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:18:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonjour traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390380#M24161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interested in this discussion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How have you confirmed this as Bonjour traffic specifically? Asking only because mDNS/DNS-SD/Avahi all utilize port 5353 for multicast discovery/zeroconf.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390380#M24161</guid>
      <dc:creator>cyberconsultants</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Prime 3.2 - Cisco ASA Configuration Archive - Function run timed out 60000ms</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-management/prime-3-2-cisco-asa-configuration-archive-function-run-timed-out/m-p/4390379#M139751</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In PRIME, In the list devices, edit the device and try changing the SSH timeout to a higher time. This could be a solution. It worked for me with a WLC.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-management/prime-3-2-cisco-asa-configuration-archive-function-run-timed-out/m-p/4390379#M139751</guid>
      <dc:creator>juancho386</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:13:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Change Webex Upgrade Schedule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/change-webex-upgrade-schedule/m-p/4390378#M4293</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your Webex site upgrade schedule is based upon what cluster your site is associated with.&amp;nbsp; The maintenance schedule can be seen here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://status.webex.com/maintenance?lang=en_US" target="_blank"&gt;https://status.webex.com/maintenance?lang=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The cluster that your site is associated with is determined when your contract is signed, I believe based upon the location of your headquarters address listed on the contract.&amp;nbsp; I would suggest reaching out to your CSM with this question to see if your site can be moved to a cluster that is regionally appropriate for your traffic flows, as well as in a better time zone.&amp;nbsp; You can get a feel for maintenance window times by looking at the site above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://help.webex.com/en-us/WBX15/How-Do-I-Contact-My-Customer-Success-Manager-CSM" target="_blank"&gt;https://help.webex.com/en-us/WBX15/How-Do-I-Contact-My-Customer-Success-Manager-CSM&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/change-webex-upgrade-schedule/m-p/4390378#M4293</guid>
      <dc:creator>sknoop1971</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T22:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5516 Migration to FPR1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5516-migration-to-fpr1140/m-p/4390377#M1080176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks guys. I think I have it all squared away. Just plugging in the MGMT port and configuring it. We will run a couple cables and set different IP's to test and see if it passes traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Eric for the text file. I will look it over. I already imported all the rules. But I may have to do it again as things changed already.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:54:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5516-migration-to-fpr1140/m-p/4390377#M1080176</guid>
      <dc:creator>scoutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:54:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCvb87210 - Need to increase timeout for WLC Configuration Archive - 1</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvb87210-need-to-increase-timeout-for-wlc-configuration/m-p/4390376#M12137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I try to run a Job to get the WLC5508 archive configuration, the "Last Run Status" show "Partial-Success", then looking on details, the "Fetch Startup" show Function run timed out 60000ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've figured out that when I try in the WLC CLI "show run-config startup-commands", It take about 160 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Prime is not able to wait the configuration answer from the WLC because the WLC takes a long time to process It.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvb87210-need-to-increase-timeout-for-wlc-configuration/m-p/4390376#M12137</guid>
      <dc:creator>juancho386</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390375#M2107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Si correcto debes ingresar por la Inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recuerda calificar las respuesta de todos los expertos que te apoyan esto nos mantiene activos en la comunidad.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390375#M2107</guid>
      <dc:creator>Javier Acuña</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:48:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Try using this tool:</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/java-error-cisco-unity/m-p/4390374#M396528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Deepak,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have CUC 10.5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to help for Directory Handler greetings wav file upload?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Java is not working and ATM has no option for Directory Handler greetings file change option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:48:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/java-error-cisco-unity/m-p/4390374#M396528</guid>
      <dc:creator>digishdave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:48:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I Isolate the Source of Tunnel Flapping EIGRP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/how-do-i-isolate-the-source-of-tunnel-flapping-eigrp/m-p/4390373#M349786</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We know very little about what is going on here. We are told that there are tunnels. But what kind of tunnels? Is it standard GRE? Is it GRE with IPSec? Is it an IPSec tunnel? Is it a VTI tunnel? Any detail you can provide may help us to better understand the issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are told that there is flapping. Is it tunnel interfaces flapping? Is it EIGRP neighbor relationship flapping? Any detail you can&amp;nbsp;provide may help us to better understand the issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:42:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/how-do-i-isolate-the-source-of-tunnel-flapping-eigrp/m-p/4390373#M349786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:42:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bonjour traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390372#M24160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I started to think that it is a firmware bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have same problems with 350 series edge switches which have same firmware version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I applied an access list to all switch ports to deny port 5353.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this is a dirty hack for me and it is annoying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/small-business-switches/bonjour-traffic/m-p/4390372#M24160</guid>
      <dc:creator>akanarya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Move Floating Panel When Sharing Content</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390371#M4292</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It most certainly does work.&amp;nbsp; I did it just today.&amp;nbsp; Moved from Screen 1 to screen 2.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390371#M4292</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraHesselberg43252</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:40:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco DNA Software Demo Series - Cisco ThousandEyes</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-events/cisco-dna-software-demo-series-cisco-thousandeyes/ba-p/4390370</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="txt-left-theme-b m-txt-center-theme-b mt-0-theme-b"&gt;&lt;A title="Register now" href="https://engage2demand.cisco.com/LP=26317" target="_self"&gt;Cisco DNA Software Demo Series - Cisco ThousandEyes&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A title="Register now" href="https://engage2demand.cisco.com/LP=26317" target="_self"&gt;Register now&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A title="Register now" href="https://engage2demand.cisco.com/LP=26317" target="_self"&gt;Wednesday, May 12, 2021&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A title="Register now" href="https://engage2demand.cisco.com/LP=26317" target="_self"&gt;10:00 am Pacific Daylight Time&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A title="Register now" href="https://engage2demand.cisco.com/LP=26317" target="_self"&gt;(San Francisco, GMT-07:00)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SaaS applications and cloud-based services are increasingly critical for on-campus users, but they can be challenging to troubleshoot—particularly because they are delivered over ISPs and other networks that are outside of your control. This webinar will demonstrate how to leverage Cisco ThousandEyes to quickly gain insight into the availability and performance of critical applications and services for campus users.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will learn how to:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI class="m-theme-b"&gt;Set up ThousandEyes on Catalyst 9000 switches through Cisco DNA Center&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="m-theme-b"&gt;Set up tests for critical applications and endpoints in the ThousandEyes portal&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="m-theme-b"&gt;Use tests to visualize network paths, troubleshoot service delivery issues, and understand performance over time&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P class="txt-left-theme-b m-txt-center-theme-b mt-0-theme-b"&gt;Live Q&amp;amp;A included.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-events/cisco-dna-software-demo-series-cisco-thousandeyes/ba-p/4390370</guid>
      <dc:creator>gajewell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390369#M2106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hola,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Si, es correcto, debes usar el INSIDE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Saludos&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390369#M2106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio E. Moisa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:31:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Routing Protocols with IPv6: Configuration, Verification, and Troubleshooting - AMA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390368#M349785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Nono,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Both 6PE and 6VPE transport IPv6 traffic over the MPLS core. The MPLS core does not need to be running IPv6 at all (except for the PE). IPv6 traffic will be encapsulated in an MPLS LSP and forwarded to the relevant egress PE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The difference between the two is that 6PE works using the global routing table on the PE, whereas 6VPE will perform the IPv6 lookup from a VRF routing table on the PE. So 6VPE is equivalent to IPv4 L3VPN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390368#M349785</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harold Ritter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to configure a Router-on-a-Stick?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/how-to-configure-a-router-on-a-stick/m-p/4390367#M503972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, it is very useful. But I still have a question. For R1 and R2, if R1 has a loopback interface which Ip address is&amp;nbsp;209.165.200.12 /24. If both PC need to ping the loopback interface, how should I&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;configure&amp;nbsp;R1 and R2 with&amp;nbsp;static routes. I guess on R2 I can use&amp;nbsp;static host routes and&amp;nbsp;static routes for R1. Is that&amp;nbsp;correct？&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/how-to-configure-a-router-on-a-stick/m-p/4390367#M503972</guid>
      <dc:creator>MasonCa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:21:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 3850 Boot Loop</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/cisco-3850-boot-loop/m-p/4390366#M503971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just went through this with TAC. To properly upgrade to the latest version if you are coming from 03.xx.xx release, you must include "new" and "force" optional arguments in your software install command.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;software install file flash:cat3k_caa-universalk9.16.09.01.SPA.bin new force&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/16-9/release_notes/ol-16-9-3850.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/16-9/release_notes/ol-16-9-3850.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If "new" and "force" is missing, switch will get stuck in boot loop with no ROMMON access. RMA is the only way to get your switches back online.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/cisco-3850-boot-loop/m-p/4390366#M503971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ignat Sitnikov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:20:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN PPTP connected, but no internet avaible</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-management/vpn-pptp-connected-but-no-internet-avaible/m-p/4390365#M139750</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you use smth like split tunelling?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC9IlHcph7E" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mC9IlHcph7E&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:22:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-management/vpn-pptp-connected-but-no-internet-avaible/m-p/4390365#M139750</guid>
      <dc:creator>kapydan88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:22:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rest Call Timeout Error Handling</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/rest-call-timeout-error-handling/m-p/4390364#M11876</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Janine!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am experiencing this issue with the Read Timeout being hit, but the error log does not contain the VXML badfetch error.&amp;nbsp; Since there is not a bad fetch error, the call does not flow through the Voice XML error catch I have at the beginning of the application.&amp;nbsp; I also have a catch for all Java exceptions at the beginning of the application.&amp;nbsp; The error is not caught there either.&amp;nbsp; So the Cisco message is played and the call is disconnected.&amp;nbsp; I need to the call to flow through the application error handling and transfer to the agent.&amp;nbsp; I also verified that the Project Properties has the Subdialog set to True.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to capture the read timeout error?&amp;nbsp; Below is what I see in the error file.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before the REST Client element, I have an audio element with the fetchaudio set and the fetchtimeout set to 30s.&amp;nbsp; In the REST Client, I updated the Read Timeout from 5000 to 30000, to match the fetchtimeout.&amp;nbsp; Right now, that is enough time for the service response to be received.&amp;nbsp; Since both of these settings match 30 seconds, I wonder if the bad fetch would be thrown first, so the call flows through the Voice XML catch.&amp;nbsp; Or maybe the Read Timeout in the Rest Client should be set higher than the fetchtimeout, to ensure the bad fetch is thrown and the call flows through our transfer logic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;xx.xx.xx.xx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.GroupClaimsTest,04/20/2021 10:28:56.034, The error was: A built-in element encountered an exception of type com.sun.jersey.api.client.ClientHandlerException. The root cause was: com.sun.jersey.api.client.ClientHandlerException: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out&lt;BR /&gt;com.audium.server.AudiumException: A built-in element encountered an exception of type com.sun.jersey.api.client.ClientHandlerException.&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.voiceElement.ActionElementBase.service(ActionElementBase.java:416)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.controller.Controller.goToAction(Controller.java:4386)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.controller.Controller.goToElement(Controller.java:4022)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.controller.Controller.continueCall(Controller.java:3702)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.controller.Controller.doPost(Controller.java:1116)&lt;BR /&gt;at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:648)&lt;BR /&gt;at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:292)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:207)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFilter.doFilter(WsFilter.java:52)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:240)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:207)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:212)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:106)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:502)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:141)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:79)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:88)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:522)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.coyote.http11.AbstractHttp11Processor.process(AbstractHttp11Processor.java:1095)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:672)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1502)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:1458)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)&lt;BR /&gt;at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)&lt;BR /&gt;Caused by: com.sun.jersey.api.client.ClientHandlerException: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.client.urlconnection.URLConnectionClientHandler.handle(URLConnectionClientHandler.java:151)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.api.client.Client.handle(Client.java:648)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.api.client.WebResource.handle(WebResource.java:680)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.api.client.WebResource.access$200(WebResource.java:74)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.api.client.WebResource$Builder.post(WebResource.java:568)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.action.rest.client.RestClientUtil.doPost(RestClientUtil.java:460)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.action.rest.client.RestClientUtil.executeAPI(RestClientUtil.java:316)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.action.rest.client.RestClientAction.doAction(RestClientAction.java:280)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.audium.server.voiceElement.ActionElementBase.service(ActionElementBase.java:390)&lt;BR /&gt;... 26 more&lt;BR /&gt;Caused by: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out&lt;BR /&gt;at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:152)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:122)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.security.ssl.InputRecord.readFully(InputRecord.java:442)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.security.ssl.InputRecord.read(InputRecord.java:480)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:946)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readDataRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:903)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.security.ssl.AppInputStream.read(AppInputStream.java:102)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:235)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:275)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:334)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.net.&lt;A href="http://www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTPHeader(HttpClient.java:690" target="_blank"&gt;www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTPHeader(HttpClient.java:690&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.net.&lt;A href="http://www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTP(HttpClient.java:633" target="_blank"&gt;www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTP(HttpClient.java:633&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.net.&lt;A href="http://www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1366" target="_blank"&gt;www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1366&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:468)&lt;BR /&gt;at sun.net.&lt;A href="http://www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getResponseCode(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:338" target="_blank"&gt;www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getResponseCode(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:338&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.client.urlconnection.URLConnectionClientHandler._invoke(URLConnectionClientHandler.java:249)&lt;BR /&gt;at com.sun.jersey.client.urlconnection.URLConnectionClientHandler.handle(URLConnectionClientHandler.java:149)&lt;BR /&gt;... 34 more&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:20:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/rest-call-timeout-error-handling/m-p/4390364#M11876</guid>
      <dc:creator>lisa.ferraro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:20:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Webex Meetings, Side by Side view, Resizing of webcam thumbnails</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-meetings-side-by-side-view-resizing-of-webcam-thumbnails/m-p/4390363#M4291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The answer to this post for anyone else upgrading to 41.4 is that this is a 'feature' to make the screen simpler to use. See Side by Side view section in the April 2021 Release Notes for 41.4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another person who has the same dislike as me:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/changing-of-meetings-layout/m-p/4386128/thread-id/4132" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/changing-of-meetings-layout/m-p/4386128/thread-id/4132&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-meetings-side-by-side-view-resizing-of-webcam-thumbnails/m-p/4390363#M4291</guid>
      <dc:creator>allamore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 5516 Migration to FPR1140</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5516-migration-to-fpr1140/m-p/4390362#M1080175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Were you also asking about moving the configuration from the old ASA to the new FTD's? There's a migration tool that can be run to assist in this. Due to changes in how NAT rules are handled it's probably a good idea to use it. When we migrated ourselves we brought up the FMC and FTDs. I've attached my short notes here, maybe they can be of service to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ej&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/5516-migration-to-fpr1140/m-p/4390362#M1080175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric R. Jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:15:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Presence Status from WebEx App in Outlook 2016</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/presence-status-from-webex-app-in-outlook-2016/m-p/4390361#M4290</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The current Release Webex App Version solved the Problem.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/presence-status-from-webex-app-in-outlook-2016/m-p/4390361#M4290</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bjoern Schonhoff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:14:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finesse 11.6 upgrade to 12.0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/finesse-11-6-upgrade-to-12-0/m-p/4390359#M120620</link>
      <description>Please check Port Utilization Guide&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kostia</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/finesse-11-6-upgrade-to-12-0/m-p/4390359#M120620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Konstantin Vaksin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:13:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forged Email Detection Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390358#M22083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My thought was maybe I should at least add Director or Manager and above to a dictionary.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something obvious &lt;LI-EMOJI id="lia_disappointed-face" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;&lt;/LI-EMOJI&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390358#M22083</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jessica Cochran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ILPOWER-3-CONTROLLER_PORT_ERR: Controller port error, Interface Gi1/0/28: Power given, but Power Controller does not report Power Good</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ilpower-3-controller-port-err-controller-port-error-interface/m-p/4390357#M503970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If cisco devices then cdp is applicable, it is also possible you have just failed poe ports which does happen, Have you tried various portd on the same switch?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ilpower-3-controller-port-err-controller-port-error-interface/m-p/4390357#M503970</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul driver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spanning and tree and static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/spanning-and-tree-and-static-routing/m-p/4390356#M503969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;STP Root should be set on top Switch connected to Router; Usually I would set Root like that especially if you have only 1 router.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Static routes are easy; Trick is to remember that you need static entry for each of networks you want to reach.&amp;nbsp; example ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Gig0/0 (or next-hop IP address)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y via interface or next IP hop.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards, ML&lt;BR /&gt;**Please Rate All Helpful Responses **&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/spanning-and-tree-and-static-routing/m-p/4390356#M503969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:04:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Routing Protocols with IPv6: Configuration, Verification, and Troubleshooting - AMA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390355#M349784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Nono82,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;6PE and 6VPE allow us to run&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;IPv6 over an IPv4-only MPLS core&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;where we use&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;dual stack PE routers&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This allows service providers to offer IPv6 to their customers without making major changes to the core of their MPLS network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The main difference between 6PE and 6VPE will be:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;6PE uses the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;global IPv6 routing table&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on the PE routers.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;6VPE uses&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;VRFs&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on the PE routers (MPLS VPN).&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gary&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Senior Technical Consulting Engineer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390355#M349784</guid>
      <dc:creator>gbolivar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T21:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to implement a unknown domain catchall or rewrite</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/how-to-implement-a-unknown-domain-catchall-or-rewrite/m-p/4390354#M22082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For Option A i would create a dictionary called "Authorized_Domains"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;add all domains in the dictionary including the&amp;nbsp;@sign, one per line max 1500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then I would create an incoming&amp;nbsp; content sender looking if sender contains list&amp;nbsp; in dictionary then quarantine to a maybe "Unauthorized Domains" for checking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Option B you would also create a content filter checking for DMARC verdict in the SMTP header and then edit the header and replace it with whatever you want to have on field Sender:&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/how-to-implement-a-unknown-domain-catchall-or-rewrite/m-p/4390354#M22082</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc.luescherFRE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CER - had an office move and brought over DID's from another area code. 911 calls go to wrong PSAP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/cer-had-an-office-move-and-brought-over-did-s-from-another-area/m-p/4390353#M396527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you say “in Intrado” if you’re referring to PS-ALI, that should be it if the record is correct and not in error. Here, TAR code along with county and town matter, but all of it is part of MSAG.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So as part of the move process the address was updated with the carrier or e911 provider . All things considered if nothing else has changed it should work.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Only other thing I can think of at random, if you moved sites and have a new SIP trunk or PRI, the carrier will have to make sure that they allow you to send the various DIDs and not the billing phone number, but you’d hope AT&amp;amp;T would catch that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/cer-had-an-office-move-and-brought-over-did-s-from-another-area/m-p/4390353#M396527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Pawlowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot find the 'Start Live Streaming' button</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/cannot-find-the-start-live-streaming-button/m-p/4390352#M4289</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/cannot-find-the-start-live-streaming-button/m-p/4390352#M4289</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvillega</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Remote management of FTD from FMC v6.7</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/remote-management-of-ftd-from-fmc-v6-7/m-p/4390351#M1080174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can check this video for a quick demo:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Ma6TnXKXw" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Ma6TnXKXw&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Make sure connectivity is good from data interface to FMC management interface and you have the routes in place, you can use FMC to make the changes to switch from management to data interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you encounter issues use the rollback cli to switch to the previous deployment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chakshu&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/remote-management-of-ftd-from-fmc-v6-7/m-p/4390351#M1080174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chakshu Piplani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:54:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded 8851s to 12.8(1) and am having issues with last line selected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/upgraded-8851s-to-12-8-1-and-am-having-issues-with-last-line/m-p/4390350#M396526</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes - it changes that behavior at some point which seems to change that param . You can revert it by using the Cisco support field with a bugID that tells the phone what behavior to do . I can post it later but I’m not at my computer . TAC can probably grab it quickly if you ask for this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/upgraded-8851s-to-12-8-1-and-am-having-issues-with-last-line/m-p/4390350#M396526</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Pawlowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:54:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390347#M278087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, my bad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390347#M278087</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Ribas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:52:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390345#M278086</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-USER uid="89946"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you referring to the other post suggesting using secondary authentication server group?....then yes, it's basically double athentication, not LDAP server failover.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390345#M278086</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390344#M278085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-USER uid="89946"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You've defined a second LDAP group called LDAP02, not created another host in the original group LDAP01. Example below demostrates how to add a second LDAP server to the same LDAP group. Authentications should failover to the second host in the group.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;aaa-server &lt;STRONG&gt;LDAP01&lt;/STRONG&gt; protocol ldap&lt;BR /&gt;aaa-server &lt;STRONG&gt;LDAP01&lt;/STRONG&gt; (INSIDE) host 1.1.1.1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-base-dn DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-scope subtree&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-naming-attribute sAMAccountName&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-login-password *****&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-login-dn CN=Services Firewall,CN=Managed Service Accounts,DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;server-type microsoft&lt;BR /&gt;aaa-server &lt;STRONG&gt;LDAP01&lt;/STRONG&gt; (INSIDE) host 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-base-dn DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-scope subtree&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-naming-attribute sAMAccountName&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-login-password *****&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ldap-login-dn CN=Services Firewall,CN=Managed Service Accounts,DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;server-type microsoft&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;. HTH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390344#M278085</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390343#M278084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi in the login the client requested twice user/password.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:44:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390343#M278084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Ribas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:44:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I wildcard match partial email addresses?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/how-do-i-wildcard-match-partial-email-addresses/m-p/4390342#M22081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A message and a content filter will allow you to use REGEX expressions to allow or block messages by sender and recipient.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/how-do-i-wildcard-match-partial-email-addresses/m-p/4390342#M22081</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc.luescherFRE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WSA upgrade for approaching EoL release</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/wsa-upgrade-for-approaching-eol-release/m-p/4390341#M9518</link>
      <description>Check this document for the compatibility matrix.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/security_management/sma/sma_all/SMA-ESA-WSA_Compatibility.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/security_management/sma/sma_all/SMA-ESA-WSA_Compatibility.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/wsa-upgrade-for-approaching-eol-release/m-p/4390341#M9518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390340#M278083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390340#M278083</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Ribas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Router recieving pings but not responding?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/router-recieving-pings-but-not-responding/m-p/4390339#M349783</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am thinking about the message&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;echo reply rcvd, src 10.2.2.90, dst 10.2.5.113,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you clarify what is 10.2.2.90 and what is 10.2.5.113?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/router-recieving-pings-but-not-responding/m-p/4390339#M349783</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:34:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can't hide floating toolbar with keyboard shortcut since update</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/can-t-hide-floating-toolbar-with-keyboard-shortcut-since-update/m-p/4390338#M4288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1186889" target="_blank"&gt;Jill.Robinson&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good idea to start a new thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree that the whole hide/show controls options need to be MUCH better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest all readers vote for&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320" target="_blank"&gt;https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/can-t-hide-floating-toolbar-with-keyboard-shortcut-since-update/m-p/4390338#M4288</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedNectar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can the content filter also filter the CC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/can-the-content-filter-also-filter-the-cc/m-p/4390337#M22080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The SMTP header should contain a field called CC and TO so I would first try if the header('CC') would allow you to identify what you would need to do. I did not test this yet with the latest software release but have done this in the past.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/can-the-content-filter-also-filter-the-cc/m-p/4390337#M22080</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc.luescherFRE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:35:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390336#M278082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I didn't find this option because the information is came from here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aaa-server LDAP01 protocol ldap&lt;BR /&gt;aaa-server LDAP01 (inside) host 1.1.1.1&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-base-dn DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-scope subtree&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-naming-attribute sAMAccountName&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-login-password *****&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-login-dn CN=Services Firewall,CN=Managed Service Accounts,DC=jupiter,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;server-type microsoft&lt;BR /&gt;aaa-server LDAP02 protocol ldap&lt;BR /&gt;aaa-server LDAP02 (inside) host 2.2.2.2&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-base-dn DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-scope subtree&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-naming-attribute sAMAccountName&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-login-password *****&lt;BR /&gt;ldap-login-dn CN=Services Firewall,CN=Managed Service Accounts,DC=xxx,DC=co,DC=ao&lt;BR /&gt;server-type microsoft&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390336#M278082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Ribas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:31:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390335#M278081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;tunnel-group TESHGROUP type remote-access&lt;BR /&gt;tunnel-group TESHGROUP general-attributes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;authentication-server-group AD1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;secondary-authentication-server-group AD2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class="notranslate" style="all: initial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390335#M278081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Move Floating Panel When Sharing Content</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390334#M4287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-USER uid="1186889" login="Jill.Robinson"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The totally-unintuitive Command+Option+Shift+H still works for me, but annoyingly pops up a confirmation window ON ANOTHER SCREEN which I have to then click before it activates. &amp;nbsp;SOOoooooo annoying.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And then even more annoying, it hides my participants panel and chat panel as well - when all I want to do is stop the stupid drop-dwon box getting in the road.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I urge you to vote for &lt;A href="https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320" target="_blank"&gt;https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:30:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390334#M4287</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedNectar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:30:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390333#M2105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Muchas gracias&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ya empece a configurar me quedo una duda para poder ingresar por ASDM utilizo el ip del INSIDE esa parte me confundió.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gracias&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:30:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390333#M2105</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidGustavoSanabriaRocha3330</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:30:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSCvo35537 - C2960XR-48FPD-I reports "Cisco {{platform}} {{deviceDescription}} {{version}}" in the Web GUI</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvo35537-c2960xr-48fpd-i-reports-quot-cisco-platform/m-p/4390332#M12136</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;I have the same problem on a&amp;nbsp;WS-C2960X-48TD-L, release&amp;nbsp;15.2(7)E3.
No error on the same device running&amp;nbsp;15.2(4)E8.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-bug-discussions/cscvo35537-c2960xr-48fpd-i-reports-quot-cisco-platform/m-p/4390332#M12136</guid>
      <dc:creator>olaszfiu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:27:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Routing Protocols with IPv6: Configuration, Verification, and Troubleshooting - AMA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390331#M349782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please help me to clarify what is the difference between 6PE and 6VPE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nono&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:27:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/dynamic-routing-protocols-with-ipv6-configuration-verification/m-p/4390331#M349782</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nono82</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:27:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC 5508 - Replace Primary Unit in HA Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-5508-replace-primary-unit-in-ha-pair/m-p/4390330#M228539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon dear&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just come across this problem and I have already found the solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you all&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:24:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc-5508-replace-primary-unit-in-ha-pair/m-p/4390330#M228539</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos Rogerio Souza Santos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:24:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Move Floating Panel When Sharing Content</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390329#M4286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-USER uid="1175410"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;You can also drag it to another screen..... Keeps sharing your original screen.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I hate to burst you bubble - but this doesn't work. Sure I can move the participant's panel and chat panel to another screen, which I do all the time anyway, but NOT the drop-down panel (which is the subject of this discussion)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I urge all reader to vote for&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320" target="_blank"&gt;https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390329#M4286</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedNectar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:26:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not able to SSH C9800-L, getting permission denied</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/not-able-to-ssh-c9800-l-getting-permission-denied/m-p/4390328#M228538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Craig. This resolved the issue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/not-able-to-ssh-c9800-l-getting-permission-denied/m-p/4390328#M228538</guid>
      <dc:creator>BhushanRam99337</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 2951: setting up and changing a static route.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/cisco-2951-setting-up-and-changing-a-static-route/m-p/4390327#M349781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;right, but I want 2 separate networks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The endgoal is to have a&amp;nbsp; decent routing table on the Cisco 2951, right now&amp;nbsp; I basically just hacked it together. (on the 2951).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Originally it wasn't working, when I tried to&amp;nbsp; add a route for the whole subnet, but could get it to work with the 255.255.255.128 netmask.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ron&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/cisco-2951-setting-up-and-changing-a-static-route/m-p/4390327#M349781</guid>
      <dc:creator>roncro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390326#M278080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;LI-USER uid="89946"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are referencing the LDAP group called LDAP01 under the tunnel-group.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You need to define another LDAP host under the LDAP01 group.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390326#M278080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:20:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Change Webex Upgrade Schedule</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/change-webex-upgrade-schedule/m-p/4390325#M4285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been recently getting notices that our webex site xyzcompany.webex.com will upgrade at the time mentioned in email. That is our production time and we would like to permanently change these upgrade times to off hours instead of manually setting upgrade time each time. Is there a feature or option to configure this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lalli&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/change-webex-upgrade-schedule/m-p/4390325#M4285</guid>
      <dc:creator>lallimander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:19:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to Move Floating Panel When Sharing Content</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390324#M4284</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-USER uid="1153931"&gt;&lt;/LI-USER&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again - not sure if this is a recent update - but ctrl+shift+Q doesn't work for me. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Command+Option+Shift+H&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; key combo hides the particpants panel and chat as well. All I want to do is hide the stupid&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;drop-down menu. &amp;nbsp;I want to KEEP the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;particpants panel and chat because I move them to another screen.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I urge all reader to vote for&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320" target="_blank"&gt;https://ciscocollabcustomer.ideas.aha.io/ideas/WXCUST-I-1320&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-move-floating-panel-when-sharing-content/m-p/4390324#M4284</guid>
      <dc:creator>RedNectar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:26:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390323#M2104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Muchas gracias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ya estoy empezando a configurar las interfaces inside y outside, pero tengo una duda para poder acceder al ASDM se utiliza el mismo ip del inside, disculpa en esa parte me confundí.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390323#M2104</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidGustavoSanabriaRocha3330</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco AP 3602i without WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap-3602i-without-wlc/m-p/4390322#M228537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;What are the possible methods of deploying a Cisco 3602i AirCap Access Point and Cisco c9105AXi AP without an external Wireless LAN Controller?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Is it possible to deploy the 3602i&amp;nbsp;access point in lightweight mode, using the inbuilt&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;AireOS Wireless Controller,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;without an external WLC?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thanks.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/cisco-ap-3602i-without-wlc/m-p/4390322#M228537</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kingsleyizuka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:13:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WSA upgrade for approaching EoL release</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/wsa-upgrade-for-approaching-eol-release/m-p/4390321#M9517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Balaji,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My bad I am using S190 and M190, so do I need to complete the upgrade in one cycle or I can run 10.x with 13.x SMA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:11:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/wsa-upgrade-for-approaching-eol-release/m-p/4390321#M9517</guid>
      <dc:creator>MehnazKhan2492</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:11:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How I configure  Two LDAP Authentication to use Anyconnect VPN (HA)</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390320#M278079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have just ONE Ldap authenticantion in connection do VPN AnyConnection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So Tried to find some option to use 2 Two LDAP (HA) just in case one fail I have secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't find option secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tunnel-group TUNNEL_VPN&amp;nbsp; general-attributes&lt;BR /&gt;address-pool (inside) POOL_VPN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;address-pool POOL_VPN&lt;BR /&gt;authentication-server-group LDAP01&lt;BR /&gt;authentication-server-group (inside) LDAP01 LOCAL &amp;lt;--------- no have option to include LDAP02 just Local&lt;BR /&gt;authorization-server-group LDAP01&lt;BR /&gt;default-group-policy GRP_VPN&lt;BR /&gt;tunnel-group TUNNEL_VPN webvpn-attributes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any clue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/vpn/how-i-configure-two-ldap-authentication-to-use-anyconnect-vpn-ha/m-p/4390320#M278079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Ribas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:03:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forged Email Detection Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390319#M22079</link>
      <description>So I have proposed this when I was in a beta.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think there's a feature that does this coming, but I can't speak to when...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Other than adding your users to the dictionary, there isn't really a way to do this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a query built against our intranet that I use to populate the dictionary. I grab HR, IT, Accounting and directors and above...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390319#M22079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:02:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I Isolate the Source of Tunnel Flapping EIGRP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/how-do-i-isolate-the-source-of-tunnel-flapping-eigrp/m-p/4390318#M349780</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as noted by Georg one potential cause for flapping of tunnels is recursive routing that happens when :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the tunnel destination address ( external address) is advertised within the tunnel .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You need to be very careful about this&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have a host&amp;nbsp; /32 static route for each tunnel destination using the offered&amp;nbsp; IP next-hop on the physical exit interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This can help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also try to use higher timers for tunnel keepalive.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope to help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Giuseppe&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/how-do-i-isolate-the-source-of-tunnel-flapping-eigrp/m-p/4390318#M349780</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giuseppe Larosa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T20:01:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMP Connector - auto-update?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/endpoint-security/amp-connector-auto-update/m-p/4390317#M6107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, but I understand how to update the versions via central control, but it is still a human-intervention.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I am interested in a new feature that would &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;automatically&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; update all workstations (in that policy) to the "latest" version... whatever it is and whenever it is released.&amp;nbsp; It is truly shocking that this is not part of the existing feature set.&amp;nbsp; Even a large corporation would probably want a group of machines in a "rapid-release" type policy that would receive this.&amp;nbsp; But small companies without a dedicated person to check and increment the version would absolutely hands-down REQUIRE this functionality.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example: a recent version of the connector for Mac caused CPU spiking.&amp;nbsp; The latest update resolved this.&amp;nbsp; How was I to know?&amp;nbsp; I don't spend my days checking the console?&amp;nbsp; I found out the issue by happenstance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/endpoint-security/amp-connector-auto-update/m-p/4390317#M6107</guid>
      <dc:creator>JF53591</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390316#M2103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hola&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Vaya lo primero es configurar las interfaces, asi:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface g0/0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;description INTERNET&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 200.x.x.x &amp;lt;mascara de subred&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;security-level 0&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nameif OUTSIDE&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;interface g0/1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;description LAN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ip address 192.x.x.x &amp;lt;mascara de subred&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;security-level 100&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nameif INSIDE&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;no shut&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route OUTSIDE 0 0 &amp;lt;siguiente salto para alcanzar internet, ejemplo 200.x.x1&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-list LAN extended permit icmp any any&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-list LAN extended permit ip any any (esto lo puedes modificar despues para hacerlo mas estricto)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-list OUTSIDE extended permit icmp any any&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-group LAN in in LAN&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;access-group OUTSIDE in in OUTSIDE&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;De ahi ya configuras ASDM, L2TP etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390316#M2103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Julio E. Moisa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:55:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cisco vpn banch to main site asa no internet at branch</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-vpn-banch-to-main-site-asa-no-internet-at-branch/m-p/4390315#M1080173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a vpn between my branch and main office. From the branch I can reach the main office and the devices there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like the branch site to hit the main sites asa and then use it for the internet breakout. I just want it for a few internet ip's, not all traffic though. I know the traffic hits the outside interface of the main, but then would have to go back out that interface for the specific ip's I want to reach. I did enter a global command for that, something with intra - I just dont recall it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems like a nat issue but I'm not sure. I'm running 8.2 on both sides.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cisco-vpn-banch-to-main-site-asa-no-internet-at-branch/m-p/4390315#M1080173</guid>
      <dc:creator>chuckdock1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Just as an FYI,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc5508-error-in-deleting-disabled-client/m-p/4390314#M228536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;BR /&gt;It works for me, I was searching by Uppercase, just change to lowercase and works well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc5508-error-in-deleting-disabled-client/m-p/4390314#M228536</guid>
      <dc:creator>edgarus18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:49:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCCX NonVoice Subsystem in partial service</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/uccx-nonvoice-subsystem-in-partial-service/m-p/4390313#M120619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was alerted an issue the other day from a UCCX Subscriber node of the NonVoice Subsystem in partial service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I checked the CCX Engine service and sub service, it showed fully up and had been up for several weeks since it was last rebooted. Nothing was in partial service.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The messages in the log are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;17067055: Apr 19 14:20:43.275 EDT %MIVR-SS_CHAT-1-SS_PARTIAL_SERVICE: [SM Tomcat Poller Thread - 1] com.cisco.wf.subsystems.chat.SubsystemChat NonVoice Subsystem is in partial service&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;17067056: Apr 19 14:20:43.280 EDT %MIVR-SS_CHAT-1-SS_PARTIAL_SERVICE_CCP_TOMCAT_DOWN: [SM Tomcat Poller Thread - 1] com.cisco.wf.subsystems.chat.SMTomcatPollerThread NonVoice Subsystem is in partial service&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't notice any service impacts, yet this is all that the log shows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UCCX version&lt;SPAN class="tabs2_section tabs2_section_1 tabs2_section1 tab_section"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="section  sn-stream-section"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="sn-widget-textblock-body sn-widget-textblock-body_formatted"&gt;12.5.1.11900-146 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen this before and is this a bug?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/contact-center/uccx-nonvoice-subsystem-in-partial-service/m-p/4390313#M120619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timothy Jaberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:49:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to clear / delete recent Personal Rooms?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-clear-delete-recent-personal-rooms/m-p/4390312#M4283</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same here.&amp;nbsp; and reported dates&amp;nbsp; of when the problem began seem matching as well.&amp;nbsp; Definitely a recent upgrade messed this "recent personal rooms" list, making recent one no longer appear and really old ones to appear.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:48:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/how-to-clear-delete-recent-personal-rooms/m-p/4390312#M4283</guid>
      <dc:creator>eniraldo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:48:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lineDevSpecific silent monitor - Operation Failed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/linedevspecific-silent-monitor-operation-failed/m-p/4390311#M3066</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's good to know.&amp;nbsp; Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, what we have is a C#/.NET application, but the TAPI files and managers are in lower levels of the code, specifically in C++ files which we compile to .dll in order to access them via the higher levels of the application (the C#/.NET stuff).&amp;nbsp; Is there anything you can see within the code snippet in my original question that seems off?&amp;nbsp; I have that within one of our C++ TAPI Managers, so I would assume that lineDevSpecific should behave normally there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:41:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/linedevspecific-silent-monitor-operation-failed/m-p/4390311#M3066</guid>
      <dc:creator>tevans2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:41:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forged Email Detection Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390310#M22078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have approximately 3500 Email Users.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:41:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/email-security/forged-email-detection-question/m-p/4390310#M22078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jessica Cochran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:41:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Webex Icon constantly flashes/blinks orange in the taskbar when not "focussed on"</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-icon-constantly-flashes-blinks-orange-in-the-taskbar-when/m-p/4390309#M4282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My webex stopped working on my mac.. It crashes now every time I turn the camera on. I have to use a family members windows machine and I absolutely loath the flashing icon... I have to take exams while they watch us on the camera and this icon in flashing in my face the whole time. The flashing icon is ruining my life... I tried to edit the registry with no success! Please add the option TO DISABLE THIS FUNCTION!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-icon-constantly-flashes-blinks-orange-in-the-taskbar-when/m-p/4390309#M4282</guid>
      <dc:creator>mfoley1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call grading mechanism - VOIP CMR and CDR audio quality metrics for Cisco Jabber and other Cisco IP phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications/call-grading-mechanism-voip-cmr-and-cdr-audio-quality-metrics/m-p/4390308#M166632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to fix audio issues by collecting different data metrics that can be used for analysis. Since onset of sudden transition from work from home , I am sure many customers like us will be dealing with sudden transition from office to work from home and looking for ways to improve user and customer experience by reducing audio issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I am at it, I was going through cisco documents and still could not find a proper data / voip data metric that can be used for analysis and I have following questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is MOS supported for Cisco Jabber? We currently have users on 12.9.x and CUCM versions 10.5.x, 11.5.x and 12.5.x&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data is pretty inconsistent in terms of MOS evaluation and comes as unknown,fair, poor, excellent etc from the same device. My concern is mostly that it is unknown.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The inbuilt cisco CDR tool in all 3 mentioned versions do not always populate VarVQMetrics and other CMR and CDR related details and raw CDR files do not always have CMR data for Cisco Jabber.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have found so far:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-Factor Data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor represents an endpoint mean opinion score (MOS) estimation algorithm that is defined in ITU standard P.VTQ. It represents a general estimator that is used to estimate the mean value of a perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) population for a specific impairment pattern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MOS relates to the output of a well designed listening experiment. All MOS experiments use a five-point PESQ scale as defined in ITU standard P.862.1, which describes the PESQ as an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MOS estimate provides a number that is inversely proportional to frame loss density. Clarity decreases as more frames are lost or discarded at the receiving end. Consider the loss or discarding of these frames as concealment. Concealment statistics measure packet (frame) loss and its effect on voice quality in an impaired network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor represents a weighted estimate of average user annoyance due to distortions that are caused by effective packet loss such as dropouts and warbles. It does not estimate the impact of delay-related impairments such as echo. It provides an estimate of listening quality (MOS-LQO) rather than conversational quality (MOS-CQO), and measurements of average user annoyance range from 1 (poor voice quality) to 5 (very good voice quality).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor gets trained or conditioned by speech samples from numerous speech databases, where each training sentence or network condition that is associated with a P.862.1 value has a duration of 8&amp;nbsp;seconds. For more accurate scores, the system generates k-factor estimates for every 8&amp;nbsp;seconds of active speech.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider K-factor and other MOS estimators to be secondary or derived statistics because they warn a network operator of frame loss only after the problem becomes significant. Packet counts, concealment ratios, and concealment second counters represent primary statistics because they alert the network operator before network impairment has an audible impact or is visible through MOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Table 2.&amp;nbsp;Devices That Support K-factor (varVQMetrics) in CMRs&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor (varVQMetrics) Support in CMR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7906&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7911&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7921&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7931&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7941&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7942-G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7942-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7945&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7960&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7961&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7962-G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7962-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7965&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone&amp;nbsp;7970&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7971&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7972-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7975&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3x MGCP Gateways&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5x MGCP Gateways&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref link :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/12_5_1/cdrdef/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251_chapter_01001.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/12_5_1/cdrdef/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251_chapter_01001.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that all audio quality metrics listed in Table 1 are stored in the CMR. For phones that do not generate CMR, such as Cisco TelePresence&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;®&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;TC, CE, CTX, and IX endpoints; Jabber&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;®&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;platforms (all platforms); Cisco IP Communicator; and Cisco Unified Personal Communicator, grading will be “N/A”.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Cisco Network Analysis Module (NAM) reports SCS as well. An audio stream reported from NAM will be graded based on SCSR, the same as an IP Phone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref link :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-collaboration/white-paper-c11-735409.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-collaboration/white-paper-c11-735409.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The language is same or rather identical in different series (e.g &amp;nbsp;10.x , 11.x ,12.x, etc)and support for devices has largely remained unchanged (at least in the guide if not real world).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone confirm the following?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is K-factor (varVQMetrics) supported for Cisco Jabber (client services framework)? If not, if there is roadmap to add support?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there a partial support for K-factor (varVQMetrics) like concealed seconds, several concealed seconds etc?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If the above are supported in current iterations of Jabber, any documentation or a doc defect?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Current list of supported phone models including soft phones. Interestingly widely used cisco 7821 and cisco 7841s are too not listed for k-factor data.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other questions I have are listed below. They are mostly aimed at Cisco Jabber however other phone model details are appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Since MOS is no longer considered a good mechanism, what call grading mechanism can be used for Cisco Jabber specifically and/or other phone models.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Suggested industry (if any) and cisco suggested Jitter or average jitter per call?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Acceptable average jitter for voice ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;nbsp;Acceptable percentage of packet loss (per call )? If this is codec dependent, then code wise suggested percentage of packet loss.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Acceptable Concealed seconds&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Acceptable Latency in CUCM CDR terms&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any other metrics that be can used?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any cisco tool that can be used to calculate percentages something similar voice bandwidth calculator?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have referenced some of the other cisco docs and third party, it is getting complicated to have to do this manually:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Voice Over IP - Per Call Bandwidth Consumption&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Understanding Codecs: Complexity, Hardware Support, MOS, and Negotiation&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/14069-codec-complexity.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/14069-codec-complexity.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bandcalc.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.bandcalc.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/diagnosis/emodel.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/diagnosis/emodel.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Please note&lt;/STRONG&gt;: to fetch all this data, I am also using a third party tool that allows me to capture some of this data in excel and csv formats that is parsed from RAW CDR files fetched from CUCM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhuvan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications/call-grading-mechanism-voip-cmr-and-cdr-audio-quality-metrics/m-p/4390308#M166632</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhuarora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMP Connector - auto-update?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/endpoint-security/amp-connector-auto-update/m-p/4390306#M6106</link>
      <description>In your AMP console go to Management/Policies, and open a policy you're using, and click Edit.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On the left you'll see boxes labeled Modes and Engines, Exclusions, Proxy, Outbreak Contro, Product Updates, Advanced Settings&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Click on Product Updates, change the product version, and set dates/intervals/reboot settings...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It will update the workstations to the version you tell it to...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should probably start with a test policy and some test machines...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:40:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/endpoint-security/amp-connector-auto-update/m-p/4390306#M6106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:40:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Webex Teams not sending activation code</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-teams-not-sending-activation-code/m-p/4390305#M4281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I checked and no spam coming from webex.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/webex-meetings-and-webex/webex-teams-not-sending-activation-code/m-p/4390305#M4281</guid>
      <dc:creator>AGuerra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problema con la configuración bridge ASA 5506 X, y como poder quitarla</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390304#M2102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Muchas gracias si efectivamente necesito algo de ayuda, como comente en el anterior post ya pude cambiar y quitar el BVI1 tampoco sabia que si se lo quita ya no se puede ingresar al ASDM, si estoy utilizando CLI a través del PuTTY.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mira la configuración en la que necesito ayuda es en utilizar el ASA5506 como router en el cual pueda ingresar un ip publico,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;y salir la red del 192.168.0.1 de ahi sale a un switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;El dhcp repartir de 192.168.0.100 para adelante dinámicos&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dejando los demás para ip estáticos&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;y crear un acceso vpn a través de L2TP vi es la mas sencilla por q no necesita crear grupos ya solo accesos a los usuarios para poder conectar a la red y tener acceso a las carpetas compartidas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="proy1.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/118537iEB34ADEEF6C6251C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="proy1.png" alt="proy1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Este es el diagrama que tengo de la configuración nota que todo esta en la misma red ya que utilizo plantillas de excel que me exige q todos tengamos acceso completo al servidor también por vpn por eso haciendo un estudio determine mi mejor opcion el L2TP, actualmente utilizo un router RV110W con el cual uso accesos de vpn por PPTP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Utilizando el CLI si te agradecería mucho, un poco de apoyo para poder crear esta configuración si es posible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gracias&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/discusiones-general/problema-con-la-configuraci%C3%B3n-bridge-asa-5506-x-y-como-poder/m-p/4390304#M2102</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidGustavoSanabriaRocha3330</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:36:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Call grading mechanism - VOIP CMR and CDR  audio quality metrics for Cisco Jabber and other Cisco IP phones</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/call-grading-mechanism-voip-cmr-and-cdr-audio-quality-metrics/m-p/4390303#M396525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure under which category should I post this for best match so I am posting it under&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Community Technology and Support Collaboration, Voice and Video IP Telephony and Phones&lt;BR /&gt;and will be posting under :&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Community Technology and Support Collaboration, Voice and Video Unified Communications Infrastructure:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to fix audio issues by collecting different data metrics that can be used for analysis. Since onset of sudden transition from work from home , I am sure many customers like us will be dealing with sudden transition from office to work from home and looking for ways to improve user and customer experience by reducing audio issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I am at it, I was going through cisco documents and still could not find a proper data / voip data metric that can be used for analysis and I have following questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is MOS supported for Cisco Jabber? We currently have users on 12.9.x and CUCM versions 10.5.x, 11.5.x and 12.5.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data is pretty inconsistent in terms of MOS evaluation and comes as unknown,fair, poor, excellent etc from the same device. My concern is mostly that it is unknown.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The inbuilt cisco CDR tool in all 3 mentioned versions do not always populate VarVQMetrics and other CMR and CDR related details and raw CDR files do not always have CMR data for Cisco Jabber.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I have found so far:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;K-Factor Data&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor represents an endpoint mean opinion score (MOS) estimation algorithm that is defined in ITU standard P.VTQ. It represents a general estimator that is used to estimate the mean value of a perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) population for a specific impairment pattern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MOS relates to the output of a well designed listening experiment. All MOS experiments use a five-point PESQ scale as defined in ITU standard P.862.1, which describes the PESQ as an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The MOS estimate provides a number that is inversely proportional to frame loss density. Clarity decreases as more frames are lost or discarded at the receiving end. Consider the loss or discarding of these frames as concealment. Concealment statistics measure packet (frame) loss and its effect on voice quality in an impaired network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor represents a weighted estimate of average user annoyance due to distortions that are caused by effective packet loss such as dropouts and warbles. It does not estimate the impact of delay-related impairments such as echo. It provides an estimate of listening quality (MOS-LQO) rather than conversational quality (MOS-CQO), and measurements of average user annoyance range from 1 (poor voice quality) to 5 (very good voice quality).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor gets trained or conditioned by speech samples from numerous speech databases, where each training sentence or network condition that is associated with a P.862.1 value has a duration of 8 seconds. For more accurate scores, the system generates k-factor estimates for every 8 seconds of active speech.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider K-factor and other MOS estimators to be secondary or derived statistics because they warn a network operator of frame loss only after the problem becomes significant. Packet counts, concealment ratios, and concealment second counters represent primary statistics because they alert the network operator before network impairment has an audible impact or is visible through MOS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Table 2. Devices That Support K-factor (varVQMetrics) in CMRs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;K-factor (varVQMetrics) Support in CMR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7906&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7911&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7921&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7931&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7940&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7941&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7942-G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7942-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7945&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7960&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7961&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7962-G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7962-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7965&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone 7970&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7971&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7972-G/GE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Unified IP Phone7975&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;X&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3x MGCP Gateways&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5x MGCP Gateways&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ref link :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/12_5_1/cdrdef/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251_chapter_01001.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/service/12_5_1/cdrdef/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251/cucm_b_cdr-admin-guide-1251_chapter_01001.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that all audio quality metrics listed in Table 1 are stored in the CMR. For phones that do not generate CMR, such as Cisco TelePresence® TC, CE, CTX, and IX endpoints; Jabber® platforms (all platforms); Cisco IP Communicator; and Cisco Unified Personal Communicator, grading will be “N/A”.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Cisco Network Analysis Module (NAM) reports SCS as well. An audio stream reported from NAM will be graded based on SCSR, the same as an IP Phone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ref link :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-collaboration/white-paper-c11-735409.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/cloud-systems-management/prime-collaboration/white-paper-c11-735409.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The language is same or rather identical in different series (e.g 10.x , 11.x ,12.x, etc)and support for devices has largely remained unchanged (at least in the guide if not real world).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone confirm the following?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is K-factor (varVQMetrics) supported for Cisco Jabber (client services framework)? If not, if there is roadmap to add support?&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a partial support for K-factor (varVQMetrics) like concealed seconds, several concealed seconds etc?&lt;BR /&gt;If the above are supported in current iterations of Jabber, any documentation or a doc defect?&lt;BR /&gt;Current list of supported phone models including soft phones. Interestingly widely used Cisco 7821 and Cisco 7841 are too not listed for k-factor data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other questions I have are listed below. They are mostly aimed at Cisco Jabber however other phone model details are appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since MOS is no longer considered a good mechanism, what call grading mechanism can be used for Cisco Jabber specifically and/or other phone models.&lt;BR /&gt;Suggested industry (if any) and cisco suggested Jitter or average jitter per call?&lt;BR /&gt;Acceptable average jitter for voice ?&lt;BR /&gt;Acceptable percentage of packet loss (per call )? If this is codec dependent, then code wise suggested percentage of packet loss.&lt;BR /&gt;Acceptable Concealed seconds&lt;BR /&gt;Acceptable Latency in CUCM CDR terms&lt;BR /&gt;Any other metrics that be can used?&lt;BR /&gt;Any cisco tool that can be used to calculate percentages something similar voice bandwidth calculator?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have referenced some of the other cisco docs and third party, it is getting complicated to have to do this manually:&lt;BR /&gt;Voice Over IP - Per Call Bandwidth Consumption&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/voice-quality/7934-bwidth-consume.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Understanding Codecs: Complexity, Hardware Support, MOS, and Negotiation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/14069-codec-complexity.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/h323/14069-codec-complexity.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.bandcalc.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.bandcalc.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/diagnosis/emodel.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/diagnosis/emodel.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please note: to fetch all this data, I am also using a third party tool that allows me to capture some of this data in excel and csv formats that is parsed from RAW CDR files fetched from CUCM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bhuvan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/call-grading-mechanism-voip-cmr-and-cdr-audio-quality-metrics/m-p/4390303#M396525</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhuarora</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:36:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lineDevSpecific silent monitor - Operation Failed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/linedevspecific-silent-monitor-operation-failed/m-p/4390302#M3065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Note, TAPI is not tested/supported for use with C#/.NET, i.e. via the compatibility layer mechanism.&amp;nbsp; Known issues include mainly/unfortunately lineDevSpecific requests, as these involve direct sharing of buffer-based objects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ensuring that the OS, application and TSP are both 32 bit or 64 bit may help, but unfortunately there is no sample code for C# and engineering will likely decline any support/escalation request due to lack of testing/support.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/call-control/linedevspecific-silent-monitor-operation-failed/m-p/4390302#M3065</guid>
      <dc:creator>dstaudt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:32:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upgraded 8851s to 12.8(1) and am having issues with last line selected</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/upgraded-8851s-to-12-8-1-and-am-having-issues-with-last-line/m-p/4390300#M396524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone, I recently have started updating our 8800 series phones (specifically 8851s) to 12.8(1) from 12.1(1) and it seems that this breaks the last line remembered.&amp;nbsp; I think I need guidance, because from what I have been able to find this is the expected behaviour.&amp;nbsp; It seems on the 12.1(1), and I have tested this, that when you have say line two selected (whether that is the ipcc extension or just a second line you have on your phone) and make or answer a call and the call disconnects it stays on that selected line.&amp;nbsp; On the 12.8(1) when you disconnect from a call on your selected secondary line and go on hook it automatically jumps you back the primary line.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the service parameter "Always Use Prime Line" to false and the "Show all calls on primary line" disabled as well.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We also have some 8865s and it is also running 12.8(1) and has the same behaviour.&amp;nbsp; I tried reverting my 8865 back to 12.7(1) and it also has the same behaviour.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Is this the expected behaviour on this newer firmware and if it is, is there a way for it to remember last line selected?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony-and-phones/upgraded-8851s-to-12-8-1-and-am-having-issues-with-last-line/m-p/4390300#M396524</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyGreene64131</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-20T19:26:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

