<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>article Making sense of Service Provider Virtualization in Service Providers Blogs</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-blogs/making-sense-of-service-provider-virtualization/ba-p/3663463</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Have you ever wondered about use cases for Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), and even more specifically why a virtual router might be a good idea for your network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Like any networking technology, virtual routing has a specific purpose with associated strengths and weaknesses.&amp;nbsp; This &lt;A href="http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/making-sense-of-service-provider-virtualization" target="_blank"&gt;blog&lt;/A&gt; looks into some of those tradeoffs as well as providing a short video on IOS-XRv 9000, the new Carrier Class Virtual Router from Cisco.&amp;nbsp; Please check it out.&amp;nbsp; This should provide some much needed perspective on the current state of virtualization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gnehib</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-25T21:12:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Making sense of Service Provider Virtualization</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-blogs/making-sense-of-service-provider-virtualization/ba-p/3663463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Have you ever wondered about use cases for Network Functions Virtualization (NFV), and even more specifically why a virtual router might be a good idea for your network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Like any networking technology, virtual routing has a specific purpose with associated strengths and weaknesses.&amp;nbsp; This &lt;A href="http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/making-sense-of-service-provider-virtualization" target="_blank"&gt;blog&lt;/A&gt; looks into some of those tradeoffs as well as providing a short video on IOS-XRv 9000, the new Carrier Class Virtual Router from Cisco.&amp;nbsp; Please check it out.&amp;nbsp; This should provide some much needed perspective on the current state of virtualization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-blogs/making-sense-of-service-provider-virtualization/ba-p/3663463</guid>
      <dc:creator>gnehib</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-25T21:12:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

