<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability in Cloud Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722101#M574</link>
    <description>Hi Balaji,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes for the same vulnerability that I am looking for, but do we have any advisory from Cisco Cloudlock or any inputs from Cloudlock standpoint.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Karthik Anbumani&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:26:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>karthikanbumani18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-09T18:26:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722065#M570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am looking for some notes or articles that confirms&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Cloudlock's response on the google+ vulnerability&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; flagged yesterday.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way we can view from cloudlock solution that if we are vulnerable to Google+&amp;nbsp; vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Awaiting a response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Karthik Anbumani&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 17:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722065#M570</guid>
      <dc:creator>karthikanbumani18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T17:55:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722071#M571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you checked Cisco talo site.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blog.talosintelligence.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://blog.talosintelligence.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722071#M571</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T18:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722087#M572</link>
      <description>Yes, but was not able to find anything there related Google+ vulnerability flagged yesterday</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722087#M572</guid>
      <dc:creator>karthikanbumani18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T18:14:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722093#M573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i found information :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://thehackernews.com/2018/10/google-plus-shutdown.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://thehackernews.com/2018/10/google-plus-shutdown.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:19:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722093#M573</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T18:19:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cloudlock's response on Google+ Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722101#M574</link>
      <description>Hi Balaji,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes for the same vulnerability that I am looking for, but do we have any advisory from Cisco Cloudlock or any inputs from Cloudlock standpoint.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Karthik Anbumani&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:26:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/cloudlock-s-response-on-google-vulnerability/m-p/3722101#M574</guid>
      <dc:creator>karthikanbumani18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-09T18:26:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

