<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Firesight security intelligence vs umbrella in Cloud Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3366421#M785</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If the firesight is configured with a dns policy (default one has no blacklists in it) and firesight is configured with URL filtering then yes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if the user goes off site, they'd have to vpn into the network to maintain the firesight protection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The umbrella option would also require 'Insight' not 'professional' in order to receive Proxy protection and not just dns.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 02:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>evan.chadwick1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-16T02:06:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firesight security intelligence vs umbrella</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3180417#M784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Anyone knows if Firesight security intelligence feeds from talos are the same maliciuos dns/url/ip lists used by umbrella?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, can we say that a user under umbrella and a user under a firesight sensors with security intelligence applied have the same level of backlisting protection?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3180417#M784</guid>
      <dc:creator>Massimo Baschieri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T05:04:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firesight security intelligence vs umbrella</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3366421#M785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the firesight is configured with a dns policy (default one has no blacklists in it) and firesight is configured with URL filtering then yes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But if the user goes off site, they'd have to vpn into the network to maintain the firesight protection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The umbrella option would also require 'Insight' not 'professional' in order to receive Proxy protection and not just dns.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 02:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3366421#M785</guid>
      <dc:creator>evan.chadwick1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-16T02:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firesight security intelligence vs umbrella</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3366657#M786</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe Firepower's URL categorization is still using the Brightcloud backend data source and not Talos intelligence.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Blacklists etc. should both be from Talos.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cloud-security/firesight-security-intelligence-vs-umbrella/m-p/3366657#M786</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-16T11:31:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

