<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP Address Sorting in Cisco CLI Analyzer</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290287#M463</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i can understand the pain you mentioned, but the program designed like that we need to as in, i also see some medical device need to put 001, if not they don't work, funny coding&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-11T21:25:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP Address Sorting</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290243#M460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is probably petty but is there a way to get the CLI Analyzer to sort IP addresses properly?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently it sorts 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.10, 192.168.1.11, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like it to sort 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.3, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried putting 001, 002, 003 as the last octet but it doesn't like that at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290243#M460</guid>
      <dc:creator>kawhite_MB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T16:54:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP Address Sorting</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290252#M461</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it depends router and IOS, why you like to use 001 instead of 1 (00 is no value beore any way)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;some programs accept that format, some dont.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290252#M461</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T17:06:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP Address Sorting</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290267#M462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm speaking specifically regarding the Cisco CLI Analyzer program.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't "like" to use 001, I was only trying that to see if CLI Analyzer would sort properly that way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290267#M462</guid>
      <dc:creator>kawhite_MB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T17:28:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP Address Sorting</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290287#M463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i can understand the pain you mentioned, but the program designed like that we need to as in, i also see some medical device need to put 001, if not they don't work, funny coding&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-cli-analyzer/ip-address-sorting/m-p/4290287#M463</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T21:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

