<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CBR8 service  provisioning with NSO in NSO Developer Hub Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3946519#M4429</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Has someone verified or validated this works,&amp;nbsp; can it be proposed to a customer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bheda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-23T17:26:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CBR8 service  provisioning with NSO</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3456364#M507</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello team, which&amp;nbsp; NED should I use for provisioning on a CBR8?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jose&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 11:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3456364#M507</guid>
      <dc:creator>jac717</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-01T11:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBR8 service  provisioning with NSO</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3456365#M508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe CBR8 is IOS-XE based. So the cisco-ios NED is the one that needs to be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If use-cases/configuration required is not currently modeled in the NED then a ticket can be raised and the model extended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 04:26:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3456365#M508</guid>
      <dc:creator>alam.bilal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T04:26:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBR8 service  provisioning with NSO</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3946519#M4429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has someone verified or validated this works,&amp;nbsp; can it be proposed to a customer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3946519#M4429</guid>
      <dc:creator>bheda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-23T17:26:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBR8 service  provisioning with NSO</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3946523#M4430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we have customers automating cbr8s with NSO&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/cbr8-service-provisioning-with-nso/m-p/3946523#M4430</guid>
      <dc:creator>KJ Rossavik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-23T17:35:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

