<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can NSO use/hold SSH keys for PubkeyAuthentication rather than password based authentication? in NSO Developer Hub Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4409796#M6347</link>
    <description>If I understand you correctly, then yes. In an authgroup you can set a private ssh key: devices authgroups group default default-map public-key private-key&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 23:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vleijon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-27T23:00:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can NSO use/hold SSH keys for PubkeyAuthentication rather than password based authentication?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4409782#M6346</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In /etc/ssh/sshd_config you can set login to allow PasswordAuthentication and/or PubkeyAuthentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a NED for Netrounds, but I believe it is set to accept PubkeyAuthentication only, and not PasswordAuthentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can NSO support this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 22:24:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4409782#M6346</guid>
      <dc:creator>samuel.coome@secunetics.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-27T22:24:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can NSO use/hold SSH keys for PubkeyAuthentication rather than password based authentication?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4409796#M6347</link>
      <description>If I understand you correctly, then yes. In an authgroup you can set a private ssh key: devices authgroups group default default-map public-key private-key&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 23:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4409796#M6347</guid>
      <dc:creator>vleijon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-27T23:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can NSO use/hold SSH keys for PubkeyAuthentication rather than password based authentication?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4410219#M6349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is exactly it!&lt;BR /&gt;I guess I never saw that when looking. Thank Victor!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2021 16:07:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/nso-developer-hub-discussions/can-nso-use-hold-ssh-keys-for-pubkeyauthentication-rather-than/m-p/4410219#M6349</guid>
      <dc:creator>samuel.coome@secunetics.com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-28T16:07:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

