<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High Availability in Web Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574618#M1306</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: &amp;quot;Arial&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;The IronPort does not offer the same "Failover" that is built into the BlueCoat product (if you are familiar with that one), so a couple of options could be to either use a load balancer or a PAC file to perform that function.&amp;nbsp; I currently use a PAC file with a Return statement of: " PROXY x.x.x.x:8080; PROXY x.x.x.x:8080"; " in order to accomplish a poor man's fail-over.&amp;nbsp; It is not a great solution in that the users’ browser has to time-out in order to utilize the second proxy and as well there are some caching issues... once that time-out occurs the browser must be restarted in order to utilize and or attempt to utilize the first proxy again.&amp;nbsp; There are some custom options for setting IE to not cache in that manner... if you want to tinker under the hood at the registry level.&amp;nbsp; In addition - for systems that can't utilize a PAC file I have a DNS record that round-robins the two proxy ip's...&amp;nbsp; but this has its own caveats as well.&amp;nbsp; Hope that helps!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mark.dorsey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-04T00:42:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574617#M1305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi does anyone know if their is currently any high availability solution for the WSA? That is I can deploy two devices and when one fails the other takes over, thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:43:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574617#M1305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kelvin Willacey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-03T20:43:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574618#M1306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: &amp;quot;Arial&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;The IronPort does not offer the same "Failover" that is built into the BlueCoat product (if you are familiar with that one), so a couple of options could be to either use a load balancer or a PAC file to perform that function.&amp;nbsp; I currently use a PAC file with a Return statement of: " PROXY x.x.x.x:8080; PROXY x.x.x.x:8080"; " in order to accomplish a poor man's fail-over.&amp;nbsp; It is not a great solution in that the users’ browser has to time-out in order to utilize the second proxy and as well there are some caching issues... once that time-out occurs the browser must be restarted in order to utilize and or attempt to utilize the first proxy again.&amp;nbsp; There are some custom options for setting IE to not cache in that manner... if you want to tinker under the hood at the registry level.&amp;nbsp; In addition - for systems that can't utilize a PAC file I have a DNS record that round-robins the two proxy ip's...&amp;nbsp; but this has its own caveats as well.&amp;nbsp; Hope that helps!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574618#M1306</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.dorsey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-04T00:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574619#M1307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually here is how you could achieve high availability if you use WSA boxes as transparent proxies:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Using WCCP as transparent redirection method - If you have Cisco (or WCCP enabled) router you could deploy 2 WSA's in different WCCP clusters (service groups), and make active-passive WSA design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WSA-1 -------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline; "&gt;wccp router&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; --fa0/0------- clients &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WSA-2 -------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Take a look at small diagram above.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we suppose you clients traffic is flowing to wccp router's interface fa0/0, and WSA-s are logically connected to router as decribed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. configure ip wccp gorup X and Y on router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip wccp v2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip wccp &lt;GROUP_X-PRIMARY&gt; redirect-list &lt;NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/GROUP_X-PRIMARY&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip wccp &lt;GROUP_Y-SECONDARY&gt; redirect-list &lt;NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/GROUP_Y-SECONDARY&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip access-list e &lt;NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/NAME-OF-REDIRECT-LIST-1&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deny something you do not want to send to WSA's&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit tcp &lt;UESRIPSUBNET&gt; any eq www&lt;/UESRIPSUBNET&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit tcp &lt;UESRIPSUBNET&gt; any eq 443&lt;/UESRIPSUBNET&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. configure WCCP&amp;nbsp; group X (primary group) on WSA-1, with router ID that equals to some wccp loopback on wccp router&amp;nbsp; (loopback is the best option bicause it is always reachable)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. configure WCCP&amp;nbsp; group Y (secondary WCCP service group) on WSA-2, with router ID that equals to some wccp loopback on router&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. The key point is configuration of WCCP redirection on router's interface:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;int fa0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip wccp &lt;GROUP_X&gt; redirect in&lt;/GROUP_X&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip wccp &lt;GROUP_Y&gt; redirect in&lt;/GROUP_Y&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So what happens here: as long as the wccp service group with higher WCCP priority has WCCP Cach engines active, traffic will be redirected to primary WSA-1.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If WSA-1 is not reachable (and thus primary wccp group has no WCCP cache engines active), users traffic will be redirected to WSA-2 cache engine that belongs to WCCP secondary group with lower WCCP priority.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If you want whole router config, I could send you...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;2. Method -Transparent redirection with PBR&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Use policy based routing...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Set ip next-hot primaryIP and after that ip next-hop secondaryIP...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I hope I helped you...&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If I was not clear (and this is most likely, since I'm working 12h now &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;), please tell me, I'll try to be more "understandable" &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.cisco.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Cheers,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Ana&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/high-availability/m-p/1574619#M1307</guid>
      <dc:creator>ana.peric</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-30T16:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

