<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Failover using the PAC file in Web Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299770#M3733</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. The browser should keep trying the first proxy. If it failed, it will try the second one. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our environment, the browsers take a brief seconds before trying the second proxy server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen some issues with IE9, not sure for IE8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried that on other browsers e.g. Chrome, Firefox? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PC Tiya</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-24T03:22:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover using the PAC file</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299767#M3730</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to failover traffic in explicit proxy mode ( without using a dedicated&amp;nbsp; load balancing appliance ) ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen some PAC file scripts to load balance the traffic between 2 Proxy servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it seems that they are not capable of handling the failover in case of a failure one one proxy server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per the testing I did, the clients still attempt to connect the failed appliance since they are not aware about the failure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299767#M3730</guid>
      <dc:creator>wkw.bcdomain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-23T10:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover using the PAC file</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299768#M3731</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Wipula&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may try return 2 proxy servers at the end of the PAC file&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; return "PROXY proxy1.domain:8080; PROXY proxy2.domain:8080";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The browser will work that out itself. This will provide you failover from the client side. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to load balance the proxy servers, without using any load-balancer, you may&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;round-robin/randomly return those 2 proxy servers in different order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:56:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299768#M3731</guid>
      <dc:creator>PC Tiya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-24T00:56:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover using the PAC file</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299769#M3732</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Prachid,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested it just now with the information provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According the packet capure, the browser still attempts to connect to the failed proxy servaral times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After few failed attempts it sends the traffic to the other proxy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The browser does this every time so it takes long for a user to get a response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;have you used this setup before and got better outcome ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The browser I am using is Internet explorer 8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Wipula.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299769#M3732</guid>
      <dc:creator>wkw.bcdomain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-24T02:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover using the PAC file</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299770#M3733</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. The browser should keep trying the first proxy. If it failed, it will try the second one. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our environment, the browsers take a brief seconds before trying the second proxy server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen some issues with IE9, not sure for IE8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you tried that on other browsers e.g. Chrome, Firefox? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 03:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299770#M3733</guid>
      <dc:creator>PC Tiya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-24T03:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Failover using the PAC file</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299771#M3734</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my experience, a fail over design via a PAC/WPAD file does not work very well.&amp;nbsp; If the proxy blocks the request using a 403, the client will assume this failed, and try the 2nd option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Vance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/failover-using-the-pac-file/m-p/2299771#M3734</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vance Kwan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-25T07:49:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

