<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple S650s in single domain in Web Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134554#M474</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I just recently purchased two S650s for my organization assuming that it could be configured like our C150s (clustered). Now that I actually hooked up the second device I found my assumption to be wrong. What is the best way to configure them for load balancing with a single domain using a single Cisco Router with transparent redirection. I already configured them both almost identically and they appear to be load-sharing the client traffic. I just wanted to verify there isn't a better way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David Rocha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-08T05:32:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple S650s in single domain</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134554#M474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just recently purchased two S650s for my organization assuming that it could be configured like our C150s (clustered). Now that I actually hooked up the second device I found my assumption to be wrong. What is the best way to configure them for load balancing with a single domain using a single Cisco Router with transparent redirection. I already configured them both almost identically and they appear to be load-sharing the client traffic. I just wanted to verify there isn't a better way.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 05:32:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134554#M474</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-08T05:32:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple S650s in single domain</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134555#M475</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rochad,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It looks like you're already using WCCP which has inherent load sharing and failover capabilities. This is the ideal scenario. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Depending on how you have configured WCCP, you may be loadbalancing based on client or destination. I believe the default for web-cache is destination based. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mostly likely, this will suit your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134555#M475</guid>
      <dc:creator>jowolfer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-11T01:17:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple S650s in single domain</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134556#M476</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;BR /&gt;     I have the devices configured for client-based load-balancing. Everything appears to be working. I also notice on my daily reports that the devices have a evenly distributed number of clients attached to each device. I think this load-balancing and fail-over option will meet our needs better than just a fail-over cluster configuration. Being that my organization is small, my cpu load on each device is extremely small. I was just wondering what the refresh time is as far as client connections? Will I get a daily report for each device that contains all clients or will the report look like it does now in the morning with just a split group of clients on each device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134556#M476</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-11T01:32:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple S650s in single domain</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134557#M477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rochad,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reports in the Monitor section of the WSA will only reflect each WSAs perspective of it's own traffic, not a shared view of all traffic. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you desire to have a single repository for all traffic via both WSAs, it is recommended that you use a 3rd party reporting solution, such as Sawmill. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can download Sawmill from our Support Portal. There are also very detailed setup and installation guides for it. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will need to contact your Sales Representative in regards to licensing, but the download from the support portal can be used for a limited demonstration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/multiple-s650s-in-single-domain/m-p/1134557#M477</guid>
      <dc:creator>jowolfer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-12T00:04:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

