<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic We actually live totally on in Web Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005658#M7110</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We actually live totally on the virtual box, and I use the hardware for testing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The way WCCP works is that the proxy "subscribes" to the data... if its not there, the router/fw just passes it through... if there are two, it sees that the one isn't participating and just sends it all to the other one.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will load balance the requests, how it does so is based on your config in the WSA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Google "WCCP load balancing"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The one other tweak is the acl you set up on the firewall has to be set to deny for the&amp;nbsp;both/all&amp;nbsp;of the WSAs otherwise your traffic&amp;nbsp;could end up hitting both...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-12T18:55:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco WSA Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005651#M7103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can someone share me a document about cisco WSA performance. I mean the throughput and how many user can be handled. Because i got nothing based on datasheet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005651#M7103</guid>
      <dc:creator>CiscoNewBie25</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T07:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please see the link below for</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005652#M7104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see the link below for WSA reporting datasheet. Let me know if it helps:-&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/web-security-appliance/datasheet_c78-729104.html"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/web-security-appliance/datasheet_c78-729104.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005652#M7104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farhan Mohamed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-06T13:02:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Page You Have Requested</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005653#M7105</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="errorHeader"&gt;The Page You Have Requested Is Not Available&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="errorTitle"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="errorURL"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/web-security-appliance/datasheet_c78-729104.html&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005653#M7105</guid>
      <dc:creator>keithsauer507</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T15:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WSA is sized based on RPM</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005654#M7106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;WSA is sized based on RPM (request per minute) let me know the number users, license bundle that you will enable&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005654#M7106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venkatesh Attuluri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T15:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We are already enabled but</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005655#M7107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are already enabled but our S170 is dog slow when doing anything in the management gui, and even slow to respond in an SSH session.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have about 160 employees, perhaps 250 machines including servers. &amp;nbsp;We have two 200/200 mbps internet connections into Ecessa PL-600 load balancers. &amp;nbsp;Is our S170 slow because we are just overkill for this thing? &amp;nbsp;I was thinking of converting it to a virtual appliance, but then we lose Layer 4 monitoring, but that may be a moot point because we have a third party IDS/IPS that is very good at catching that kind of thing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE class="cols" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" id="installed_feature_keys"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TH&gt;Description&lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH&gt;Status&lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH&gt;Time Remaining&lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;TH&gt;Expiration Date&lt;/TH&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco L4 Traffic Monitor&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Perpetual&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;N/A&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco HTTPS Proxy&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Perpetual&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;N/A&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;File Reputation&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;296 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sat Feb 3 05:25:24 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco Web Usage Controls&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;297 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sun Feb 4 04:29:32 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sophos&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;297 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sun Feb 4 04:29:27 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;File Analysis&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;296 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sat Feb 3 05:25:23 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Webroot&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;297 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sun Feb 4 04:29:18 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco Web Proxy &amp;amp; DVS Engine&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Perpetual&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;N/A&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Perpetual&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;N/A&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Cisco Web Reputation Filters&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Active&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;297 days&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Sun Feb 4 04:29:42 2018&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005655#M7107</guid>
      <dc:creator>keithsauer507</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T18:24:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My S100v definitely performs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005656#M7108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My S100v definitely performs better than my S170, I've got about 400 users, and 150 servers.... 2 100meg pipes to the internet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at going to a S300V because my logging drive gets full...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can make L4TM&amp;nbsp;work&amp;nbsp;on VMware but its not worth the effort, especially so with an IPS in place.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005656#M7108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T18:35:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I need to start researching</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005657#M7109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to start researching how to migrate to the virtual appliance. &amp;nbsp;So you have both, a virtual and an S170? &amp;nbsp;How does that work? &amp;nbsp;Do you only break out the S170 if there is an issue with the virtual?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right now Cisco ASA 5525X use WCCP and transparent web proxy to our one and only S170. &amp;nbsp;If the S170 fails or gets a software upgrade, the internet continues to work, although unfiltered. &amp;nbsp;I have yet to test if you can put multiple WCCP addresses in the ASA firewall and how the firewall would behave. &amp;nbsp;Would it do a load balancing? &amp;nbsp;How? &amp;nbsp;Round robin? Would it just utilize the first entry unless it becomes unreachable?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Where can I read more about this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005657#M7109</guid>
      <dc:creator>keithsauer507</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T18:45:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We actually live totally on</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005658#M7110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We actually live totally on the virtual box, and I use the hardware for testing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The way WCCP works is that the proxy "subscribes" to the data... if its not there, the router/fw just passes it through... if there are two, it sees that the one isn't participating and just sends it all to the other one.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It will load balance the requests, how it does so is based on your config in the WSA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Google "WCCP load balancing"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The one other tweak is the acl you set up on the firewall has to be set to deny for the&amp;nbsp;both/all&amp;nbsp;of the WSAs otherwise your traffic&amp;nbsp;could end up hitting both...&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/web-security/cisco-wsa-performance/m-p/3005658#M7110</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken Stieers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T18:55:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

