<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using outbound Nat on existing VIP address CSS11000 in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99005#M1124</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have found a document on how it allow internal servers (10.x.x.x) to nat behind a registered address.  But can this Address also be the same registered address that I am inbound load balancing on??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2002 14:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jannis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-23T14:47:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using outbound Nat on existing VIP address CSS11000</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99005#M1124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have found a document on how it allow internal servers (10.x.x.x) to nat behind a registered address.  But can this Address also be the same registered address that I am inbound load balancing on??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2002 14:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99005#M1124</guid>
      <dc:creator>jannis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-23T14:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using outbound Nat on existing VIP address CSS11000</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99006#M1125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check with Cisco to be sure but I&amp;#146;m almost positive you&amp;#146;re going to need to get another address from your SP.  You could also test it during a maintenance window.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 13:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99006#M1125</guid>
      <dc:creator>s-doyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-31T13:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using outbound Nat on existing VIP address CSS11000</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99007#M1126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, i think you can as long as there is a way of diferentiate the services (by URL, cookie,ssl id, etc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have one public ip address and two or more private ip addresses NAT(ed) in the CSS...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/using-outbound-nat-on-existing-vip-address-css11000/m-p/99007#M1126</guid>
      <dc:creator>ptrigueira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-26T14:54:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

