<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACE/FWSM design question in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891659#M17481</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the same design and it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cwangskr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-24T20:52:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE/FWSM design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891658#M17480</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi - I'm designing the network topology for a multi tiered application using a 6509 with ACE and FWSM. Each tier will be in it's own VLAN and IP subnet and communications between tiers needs to be firewalled and in some cases loadbalanced. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I propose to do this by using a different context on both the ACE and the FWSM and using bridging mode within each context on both the FWSM and ACE as per Cisco's verified design for ACE/FWSM. It's perfectly feasable that a connection could be made for example to a server in the web tier, which would then need to make a connection to a server in the Application tier, which would in turn need to make a connection to a server in the database tier. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I can see, the design I've proposed should work. Is anyone in a position to comment on whether there is anything wrong with this design, or a better way to do it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no NAT to consider within this network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've attached a JPG showing an example of the sort of connectivity that could be expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:35:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891658#M17480</guid>
      <dc:creator>d-fillmore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-20T16:35:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE/FWSM design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891659#M17481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have the same design and it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891659#M17481</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwangskr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-24T20:52:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE/FWSM design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891660#M17482</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are planning to do the same type of design. Does anyone have any documents that point to the specifics of the design and configuraton details?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be greatley appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dmitry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891660#M17482</guid>
      <dc:creator>dtochilovsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-26T20:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE/FWSM design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891661#M17483</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your responses. I'm half way through implemeting this and there have been no problems so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With regards design &amp;amp; config notes for this, this document has most of what you need - &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns376/c649/ccmigration_09186a008078de90.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns376/c649/ccmigration_09186a008078de90.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 19:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891661#M17483</guid>
      <dc:creator>d-fillmore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-30T19:33:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE/FWSM design question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891662#M17484</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any experience in designing/implementing the FWSM in routed mode but the ACE in bridged mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSFC &amp;gt; FWSM(routed) &amp;gt; ACE(bridged)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dmitry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-fwsm-design-question/m-p/891662#M17484</guid>
      <dc:creator>dtochilovsky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-04T17:44:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

