<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which switch? in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/which-switch/m-p/162425#M1983</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;definitely I would go for the 11500 and not the 11150 or 11050 or 11800.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better performance and more possibility on the 11500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few remarks however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 11501 has a fixed chassis.  So, you have no choice about interfaces module. Also, if you want a SSL module, you have to order it now with the 11501.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 11503 and 11506 hace configurable chassis and you can order the SSL module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another good choice would be the CSM with the SSL module for the catalyst 6500.  Especially good choice if you already have cat6500 deployed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-04-14T15:35:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which switch?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/which-switch/m-p/162424#M1982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the design stage for a new website.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently the plan is for 3 web servers and 2 back end content management and registration databases running SQL 2000 (MS).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are looking at either two 11501 (for tollerance)  to load ballance across the web servers  or if we can use a CSM 11506 to  duplicate writes to two database servers (instead of an MS cluster) an 11506 with two SCM's connected to a pair of Catalyst switches. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The website will have an average of 3M throughput rising to 18M peak.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason for a 11506 is that the same infrastructure may well have to support an Extranet in the near future which will make heavy use of SSL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What additional information is needed for anyone to offer any advice on the choice of switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/which-switch/m-p/162424#M1982</guid>
      <dc:creator>bbcornwall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-14T11:45:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which switch?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/which-switch/m-p/162425#M1983</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;definitely I would go for the 11500 and not the 11150 or 11050 or 11800.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Better performance and more possibility on the 11500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few remarks however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 11501 has a fixed chassis.  So, you have no choice about interfaces module. Also, if you want a SSL module, you have to order it now with the 11501.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 11503 and 11506 hace configurable chassis and you can order the SSL module.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;another good choice would be the CSM with the SSL module for the catalyst 6500.  Especially good choice if you already have cat6500 deployed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/which-switch/m-p/162425#M1983</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-04-14T15:35:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

