<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Probe question on ACE in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035665#M20604</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;more to add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually all these ports will be listen by a http server. so with your config i have replaced the probe type to be http&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config you attached has a class map to match the vip address with a policy map type loadbalance and have a action with server farm. how do i also get stickyness applied. within the policy -map only one action is allowed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so when a request on port 8111, it should be loadbalanced and translated to port 9111. and stickyness applied. with any other ports probing 9010, 9112 failure the server should be removed from the requests being sent. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will appreciate your comments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>followurself</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-19T11:17:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035650#M20589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a serverfarm with four rservers defined with port 80,8080,8009. Each rserver is defined with a probe for each individual probes like TCP_80, TCP_8080 and TCP_8009&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out of these three ports only port 80 is listening. Other ports are down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I do show serverfarm it says probe failed. why? I know 2 ports are down but port 80 is listening &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035650#M20589</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T22:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035651#M20590</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Post &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Show  run probe &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;amp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh probe &lt;PROBE&gt; detail&lt;/PROBE&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syed Iftekhar Ahmed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035651#M20590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Syed Iftekhar Ahmed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T23:24:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035652#M20591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know how to do show probe but thats not what I  am asking . I have a serverfarm defined as follows. This serverfarm has only 1 server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show serverfarm 204.6.147.30-any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; serverfarm     : 204.6.147.30-any, type: HOST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; total rservers : 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ---------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                                ----------connections-----------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       real                  weight state        current    total&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   ---+---------------------+------+------------+----------+--------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   rserver: nj09mhe0111&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       172.28.8.46:0         8      PROBE-FAILED 0          0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The rserver looks like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rserver host nj09mhe0111&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 172.28.8.46&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe PING&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The serverfarm looks like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm host 204.6.147.30-any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP_80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP_8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP_40000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP_40001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP_50668&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver nj09mhe0111&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only port 80 is running on the server but the probe fails for the serverfarm.why? We need to probe those  services even though they are down&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are the probes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;probe tcp TCP_40000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 40000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  interval 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  passdetect interval 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  connection term forced&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;probe tcp TCP_40001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 40001&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  interval 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  passdetect interval 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  connection term forced&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035652#M20591</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T00:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035653#M20592</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you define multiple probes under a severfarm then all need to pass before serverfarm is declared operational.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want it to fail only when all probes fail then you need to use "fail-on-all" command under server  farm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035653#M20592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Syed Iftekhar Ahmed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T02:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035654#M20593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is no fail-on-all command under serverfarm. There is failaction command. But so let me get this straight. If 4 probes are defined under serverfarm and only 1 probe is up i should use the fail-on-all command right? so where is this command under serverfarm I only see&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;description  Configure description string for serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  do           EXEC command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  end          Exit from configure mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  exit         Exit from this submode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  failaction   Configure action to be taken on rserver failure or removal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  no           Negate a command or set its defaults&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  predictor    Configure Load Balancing Predictor Algorithm for the serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe        Associate probe with sfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  retcode      Configure http return code checking&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver      Associate server with serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  transparent  No virtual-address to real-address translation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035654#M20593</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T14:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035655#M20594</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The fail-on-all option comes with ACE 2.1.0:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Quoth the manual:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"By default, real servers that you configure in a server farm inherit the probes that you configure directly on that server farm. When you configure multiple probes on a server farm, the real servers in the server farm use an OR logic with respect to the probes. This means that if one of the probes configured on the server farm fails, all the real servers in that server farm fail and enter the PROBE-FAILED state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With AND logic, if one server farm probe fails, the real servers in the server farm remain in the OPERATIONAL state. If all the probes associated with the server farm fail, then all the real servers in that server farm fail and enter the PROBE-FAILED state. You can also configure AND logic for probes that you configure directly on real servers in a server farm. For more information, see the command in server farm host real server configuration mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Examples&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To configure the SERVER1 real server to remain in the OPERATIONAL state unless all associated probes fail, enter the following commands:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config)# rserver SERVER1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config-rserver-host)# ip address 192.168.12.15&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config-rserver-host)# probe HTTP_PROBE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config-rserver-host)# probe ICMP_PROBE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config-rserver-host)# fail-on-all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To remove the AND probe logic from the real server and return the behavior to the default of OR logic, enter the following command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;host1/Admin(config-rserver-host)# no fail-on-all"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example from my 2.1.0a system:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ace1/web2(config)# serverfarm FARM-Wibble&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ace1/web2(config-sfarm-host)# ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configure host serverfarm:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  description        Configure description string for serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  do                 EXEC command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  end                Exit from configure mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  exit               Exit from this submode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  fail-on-all        Fail reals when all probes fail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  failaction         Configure action to be taken on rserver failure or removal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  no                 Negate a command or set its defaults&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  partial-threshold  Configure partial-threshold % to deactivate the sfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  predictor          Configure Load Balancing Predictor Algorithm for the serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe              Associate probe with sfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  retcode            Configure http return code checking&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver            Associate server with serverfarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  transparent        No virtual-address to real-address translation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which version of ACE software are you using?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cathy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035655#M20594</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscocsoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T14:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035656#M20595</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running REL_3_0_0_A1_6_3 and thats a problem i don't see that commands under rserver and serverfarm &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035656#M20595</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T15:07:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035657#M20596</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will need to upgrade from 1.6.3 to version 2.1.0 or higher to use this feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cathy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035657#M20596</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscocsoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T15:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035658#M20597</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;whats the exact release can u send me show version from your box &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035658#M20597</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T15:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035659#M20598</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh ver &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Application Control Software (ACSW)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TAC support: &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/tac" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/tac&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Copyright (c) 2002-2008, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The copyrights to certain works contained herein are owned by&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;other third parties and are used and distributed under license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some parts of this software are covered under the GNU Public&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;License. A copy of the license is available at&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Software&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  loader:    Version 12.2[120]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  system:    Version A2(1.0a) [build 3.0(0)A2(1.0a) adbuild_04:14:49-2008/04/18_/auto/adbu-rel3/rel_a2_1_throttle/REL_3_0_0_A2_1_0A]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  system image file: [LCP] disk0:c6ace-t1k9-mz.A2_1_0a.bin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  installed license: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035659#M20598</guid>
      <dc:creator>ciscocsoc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T15:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035660#M20599</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is 2.1 a safe harbor code?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035660#M20599</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirit_patel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-24T16:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035661#M20600</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please elborate the OR logic, when one probe fails all servers in the farm enter the probe failed state. does that mean no requests will be processed for that server farm?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;one more question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we want a single vip to listen on multiple ports. e.g port 8010, 8111, 8112. there are 3 servers in the farm. these servers actually listen on 9010, 9111, 9112..how does the port translation happens and how will ace understand if request come for 8010 forward it to 9010 and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also probing on ports 9010, 9111 and 9112 needs to be enabled and if 9010 stops listening on port 9010, only that server should be out of service for all the 3 ports. how this can be achieved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035661#M20600</guid>
      <dc:creator>followurself</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T07:51:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035662#M20601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have written and attached a sample config for your requirement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Above discussion doesn't hold true for your requirement. You need 3 different class-maps and policies. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035662#M20601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Syed Iftekhar Ahmed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T08:15:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035663#M20602</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The wording was a little bit misleading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The default is that if you configure many probes and one of them fails, the rservers which didn't respond to the probe, will go down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only those rservers will fail. Not all of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the new command provided, all probes for one rserver need to fail before that rserver is put into failed state.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035663#M20602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T12:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035664#M20603</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It became misleading because in question only a single real server was used in the serverfarm &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;syed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035664#M20603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Syed Iftekhar Ahmed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-12T15:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035665#M20604</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;more to add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually all these ports will be listen by a http server. so with your config i have replaced the probe type to be http&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The config you attached has a class map to match the vip address with a policy map type loadbalance and have a action with server farm. how do i also get stickyness applied. within the policy -map only one action is allowed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so when a request on port 8111, it should be loadbalanced and translated to port 9111. and stickyness applied. with any other ports probing 9010, 9112 failure the server should be removed from the requests being sent. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will appreciate your comments&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035665#M20604</guid>
      <dc:creator>followurself</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-19T11:17:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035666#M20605</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For sticky, just create a sticky serverfarm and reference your existing serverfarm, then change your loadbalance policy to refer to your sticky serverfarm instead of your existing serverfarm.  You could try reading the manuals...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035666#M20605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frederick Reimer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-19T12:39:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035667#M20606</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;load balancing policy can have either sticky command or server farm. so with the config attached where we need a single vip listening for multiple ports and then understand when a request received for a port say 8010 translated to 9010 only and not others. the load balance policy is created for the same. how do i get also sticky group attached in the same policy without affecting the requirements&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035667#M20606</guid>
      <dc:creator>followurself</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-19T14:05:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035668#M20607</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;part of the config from the attachment given before&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-all APP-8010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  2 match virtual-address 192.168.1.100 tcp eq 8010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map type loadbalance first-match APP-8010-Policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class class-default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     serverfarm SF-PORT-8010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm host SF-PORT-8010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  predictor leastconns&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP9111&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  probe TCP9112&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver Realserver1 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver Realserver2 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  rserver Realserver3 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map multi-match VIPS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class APP-8010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance vip inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance policy APP-8010-Policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance vip icmp-reply active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how do i also get stickyness for http cookie in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035668#M20607</guid>
      <dc:creator>followurself</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-19T14:26:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Probe question on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035669#M20608</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can read the "Cisco Application Control Engine Module Server Load-Balancing Configuration Guide" Chapter 5 - "Configuring Stickiness" to start.  There is a section there on the Overview of Stickiness, Configuration Requirements and Considerations, and a specific section on Configuring HTTP-Cookie Stickiness.  Finally, there are sections on Configuring an SLB Traffic Policy for Stickiness, Displaying Sticky Configurations and Statistics, Clearing Sticky Statistics, and actual Example of a Stick Configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a specific question, by all means ask, but a general "how do I configure stickiness" is well answered by the manuals.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/probe-question-on-ace/m-p/1035669#M20608</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frederick Reimer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-19T14:33:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

