<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Load Ballancing Need in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087220#M22017</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking for solution for a Virtual Address that vcan dynamically connect to 2 or more real servers at diverse loacations&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>elawton1986</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-23T14:29:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087220#M22017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking for solution for a Virtual Address that vcan dynamically connect to 2 or more real servers at diverse loacations&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087220#M22017</guid>
      <dc:creator>elawton1986</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-23T14:29:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087221#M22018</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the current solution is the Application Control Engine (ACE) replacing the CSS and CSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of them will be able to achieve what you describe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087221#M22018</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-23T22:38:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087222#M22019</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does the ACE replace/improve on the functionality of the CSS/CSM?  The information on Cisco's website is very buzzword oriented, and I need a real technical person's perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently using CSS's in multiple datacenters to both load-balance internally, and load-balance between datacenters for web accessible applications.  How would I use the ACE to improve this service?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Brandon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087222#M22019</guid>
      <dc:creator>branfarm1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-24T00:37:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087223#M22020</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the info.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087223#M22020</guid>
      <dc:creator>elawton1986</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-29T21:57:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087224#M22021</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;please see the attached pdf outlining CSS/CSM/ACE feature comparison&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087224#M22021</guid>
      <dc:creator>ropethic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-30T18:46:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Ballancing Need</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087225#M22022</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACE offers up to 16G of throughput. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The on-board SSL functions are faster than those of the CSS and offers more possibilities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACE has many HTTP features the CSS does not have - like possibility to insert data in the http header or dynamic cookie stickyness.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You also get generic layer4 payload analysis which let's you do loadbalancing/stickyness of your own/personal protocols.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are many other features that do not exist on the CSS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, ACE will support IPv6 in the future and the CSS won't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:53:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-ballancing-need/m-p/1087225#M22022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-05T09:53:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

