<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090559#M22136</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/IpSubnet/home.pl" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/IpSubnet/home.pl&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;URL for subnet calculator&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/31 will only give you one address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the router can see the nme in wccp group, it should be fine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All routers with ip wccp 61 &amp;amp; 62 will be part of the same group. With the NME and Appliance, you just need to provide the wccp router list. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try in my lab also. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when done, do a show wccp routers on wae&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if router shows up then you are fine. WCCP will use the highest IP address of an interface to identify itseld to WAE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ropethic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T15:34:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090553#M22130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would just like to confirm if there is any reason why using a /31 mask would not work with an NME using WCCP? If not, what the reason would be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't believe this would work with the Appliance on it's own VLAN, probably at least a /29??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090553#M22130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Pinto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T10:04:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090554#M22131</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi again,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope my query is not to ambiguous or sounds trivial.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would just like to confirm it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090554#M22131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Pinto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T12:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090555#M22132</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will need a least a /30&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With a /30 you get 2 host addresses. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So lets say network 0, host 1 and 2. x.x.x.1 for  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the gateway, 2 for the NME, WCCP router list x.x.x.1, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a sample config&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge#configure terminal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config)#int integrated-Service-Engine 1/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#ip address 10.10.100.1 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#service-module ip address 10.10.100.2 255.255.255.252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.100.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#ip wccp redirect exclude in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#exit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config)#end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge#copy running-config startup-config&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090555#M22132</guid>
      <dc:creator>ropethic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T13:08:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090556#M22133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the prompt response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am OK with the general required config, it's the mask I'm querying. I'm being told the /31 would be OK. So, below is the intendended config in question (using your example host range of .1 and .2):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config)#int integrated-Service-Engine 1/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#ip address 10.10.100.1 255.255.255.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#service-module ip address 10.10.100.2 255.255.255.254&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;R2821-edge(config-if)#service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.100.1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works with Point-2-Point links and the likes, but with the NME? This is where my query lies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the assistance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090556#M22133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Pinto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T13:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090557#M22134</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with a /31 you only get 1 subnet address and that would not allow for the NME WAE and gateway to be on the same network. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if int engine is 10.10.100.1 whta will you use for an address for NME service module?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i guess you could /31 with 10.10.100.2 but will need a default route on the NME to get to the default gateway or simply have a L2 connection to the between the wae and integrated service engine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would probably work, but not sure why you would not want to use a minum of two address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need an IP on the NME for CMS registration back to CM. It has always been Cisco best practice to put engine and module on same net&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090557#M22134</guid>
      <dc:creator>ropethic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T14:06:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090558#M22135</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the promt reply,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like you say, there are the two adresses, and it would probbaly work, but it's not best practice, so I was just looking for some confirmation on the best practices which you have provided.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will let you know the outcome soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090558#M22135</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Pinto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T14:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090559#M22136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/IpSubnet/home.pl" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/IpSubnet/home.pl&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;URL for subnet calculator&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/31 will only give you one address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as the router can see the nme in wccp group, it should be fine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All routers with ip wccp 61 &amp;amp; 62 will be part of the same group. With the NME and Appliance, you just need to provide the wccp router list. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try in my lab also. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when done, do a show wccp routers on wae&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if router shows up then you are fine. WCCP will use the highest IP address of an interface to identify itseld to WAE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:34:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090559#M22136</guid>
      <dc:creator>ropethic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-18T15:34:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAAS - NME Implementaion confirmation question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090560#M22137</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Were you able to try this in the lab yet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the prompt responses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:39:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-nme-implementaion-confirmation-question/m-p/1090560#M22137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Pinto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-21T10:39:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

