<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FTP load balance on ACE in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146472#M23705</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:38:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jteixido</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-04-06T12:38:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146469#M23702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt; Has anyone load balanced FTP on the ACE? If so can you please leave a configuration example?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:04:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146469#M23702</guid>
      <dc:creator>jteixido</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-03T20:04:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146470#M23703</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-any FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   2 match virtual-address 10.10.10.100 tcp eq ftp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map type loadbalance first-match FTP-POLICY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class class-default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    serverfarm FTP-SFarm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map multi-match VIPS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance vip inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance policy FTP-POLICY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    loadbalance vip icmp-reply&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inspect ftp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146470#M23703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Syed Iftekhar Ahmed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-03T22:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146471#M23704</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want FTP passive mode to work then in addition to the above configuration also add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-any FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  match virtual-address 10.10.10.100 tcp range 1023 65535&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:08:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146471#M23704</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesLuther</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-04T16:08:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146472#M23705</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:38:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146472#M23705</guid>
      <dc:creator>jteixido</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-06T12:38:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146473#M23706</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wouldn't the ACE Ftp inspect also open the ports on the vip for the traffic to be loadbalanced? What you described raises security concerns. You could possibly have a firewall in front of the ACE doing the filtering (and ftp inspect)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:58:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146473#M23706</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mehdi_ab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-08T15:58:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146474#M23707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kindly find these two examples for FTP load balance method in cisco ACE:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. FTP serverfarm on Cisco ACE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://snippets101.blogspot.com/2007/06/ftp-serverfarm-on-cisco-ace.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://snippets101.blogspot.com/2007/06/ftp-serverfarm-on-cisco-ace.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. FTP Load Balancing on ACE in Routed Mode Configuration Example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/FTP_Load_Balancing_on_ACE_in_Routed_Mode_Configuration_Example" target="_blank"&gt;http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/FTP_Load_Balancing_on_ACE_in_Routed_Mode_Configuration_Example&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. FTP Load Balancing on ACE in One-Arm Mode Configuration Example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/FTP_Load_Balancing_on_ACE_in_One-Arm_Mode_Configuration_Example" target="_blank"&gt;http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/FTP_Load_Balancing_on_ACE_in_One-Arm_Mode_Configuration_Example&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146474#M23707</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachinga.hcl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-08T22:48:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146475#M23708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this commands were only needed as a workaround for an old defect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With the latest versions, I don't think this is required anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FTP inspection should take care of everything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146475#M23708</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-09T06:01:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146476#M23709</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well Gilles&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went ahead and tried it in the labs. If you don't open the range of ports, ftp pasv does not work. Inspect ftp doesn't seem to resolv the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:58:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146476#M23709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mehdi_ab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-27T18:58:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FTP load balance on ACE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146477#M23710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you don't need to modify the FTP class.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if you do client-nat, you need to create a new class and a new policy to perform client nat on the data connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, inspect FTP can't do that alone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you should have&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class ftp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  match virt x.x.x.x tcp eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class ftp-data-nat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  match virt x.x.x.x tcp range ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy multi FTP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class ftp &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    load ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    nat dynamic ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    inspect ftp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  class ftp-data-nat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    nat dynamic ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without client nat, the class ftp-data-nat is not required for passive ftp to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:34:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ftp-load-balance-on-ace/m-p/1146477#M23710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T12:34:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

