<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACE crashed in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-crashed/m-p/1148169#M23772</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should neither run A2(1.1) nor A2(1.2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Go to the latest version A2(1.4a).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read the documentation and release-notes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will see we fixed quite a lot of bugs since A2(1.2)...so why take the risk to run into those bugs by staying in A2(1.2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe the tac person made a type and wanted to say A2(1.3) ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-07T07:50:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE crashed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-crashed/m-p/1148168#M23771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2 aces rebooted in 2 days . One was running code a2(1.1) and another a2(1.2). When we logged a call with cisco they said we need to upgrade to a2(1.2) to fix the problem. Well the ace which got rebooted today is running a2(1.2). ummm whats going on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-crashed/m-p/1148168#M23771</guid>
      <dc:creator>cricketbuff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-07T01:47:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE crashed</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-crashed/m-p/1148169#M23772</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should neither run A2(1.1) nor A2(1.2)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Go to the latest version A2(1.4a).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read the documentation and release-notes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will see we fixed quite a lot of bugs since A2(1.2)...so why take the risk to run into those bugs by staying in A2(1.2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe the tac person made a type and wanted to say A2(1.3) ???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-crashed/m-p/1148169#M23772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-07T07:50:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

