<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: weighted firewall loadbalancing in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185332#M2383</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is currently no way to give a weight to a firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, you could play with the static routes so that more routes point to the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GigE Firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would do something like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just an example.  But you can see that firewall 1 and 2 will get all traffic to 128.0.0.0 -255.255.255.255 and the traffic from 0.0.0.0 to 127.255.255.255 wil be loadbalanced over the 4 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2003 08:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-02-22T08:37:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>weighted firewall loadbalancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185331#M2382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who are using CSS as a firewall load balancer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by the way he have two firewall with fast-ethernet interfaces and two with Gigabit ethernet interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the load is 1:1:1:1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I give a load to firewall path on CSS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, what command it is?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185331#M2382</guid>
      <dc:creator>msmoon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-02-21T08:24:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weighted firewall loadbalancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185332#M2383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is currently no way to give a weight to a firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, you could play with the static routes so that more routes point to the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GigE Firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would do something like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just an example.  But you can see that firewall 1 and 2 will get all traffic to 128.0.0.0 -255.255.255.255 and the traffic from 0.0.0.0 to 127.255.255.255 wil be loadbalanced over the 4 firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2003 08:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185332#M2383</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-02-22T08:37:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weighted firewall loadbalancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185333#M2384</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If CSS know the path which firewall the packets comes from, then your method looks no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Internet ----- CSS_out--------four firewalls--------CSS_in------Servers(A.B.C.0/24)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSS_out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/24 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/24 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/24 firewall 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/24 firewall 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/25 firewall 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route A.B.C.0/25 firewall 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSS_in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 3 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 firewall 4 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 1 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 128.0.0.0/1 firewall 2 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How about this?     Is it OK?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if CSS know the information of session flow, It looks have a risk of problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:59:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185333#M2384</guid>
      <dc:creator>msmoon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-02-24T07:59:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weighted firewall loadbalancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185334#M2385</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;this should be ok as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This method is not new.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Big ISP's used to do this in the past to do BGP loadbalancing (before the invention of BGP multipath).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe a lot of people are still using this method.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, it should work for the CSS as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/weighted-firewall-loadbalancing/m-p/185334#M2385</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-02-27T11:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

