<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACE :Transparent Cache-SP in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161397#M24062</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Gilles, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; as per TAC its a single server and not the whole farm, im kinda still looking for confirmation as the whole farm failing will be catastrophic....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for normalization, for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my cache team says , the FTP starts with TCP and then for data transfer uses UDP, in this case ACE would drop the packet ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we configure application specific normalization parameters ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shukla. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shukla1975</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-31T19:26:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE :Transparent Cache-SP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161395#M24060</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Gurus, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I have a setup for transparent caching with my SP client and as of now we are using leastconn as predictor with A2(1.3) as the version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here are my pain points:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. The Cache guys tell me the moment we turn normalization ON  the caches cant FTP the logs to their FTP servers (the traffic/conn drops after sometime).we dont  have randomization ON.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I feel its more of the cache issue or of the connection than of security as normalization will either allow or disallow but will not terminate after some time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. also im observing  in "show stats" output , lot of "Total layer4 rejections" and some Layer7 conns, and "Total times rserver was unavailable" .. as we see probe-fails a lot when traffic peaks up thus making cache to be out-of-service , need to know when do we have these issues.does it need to have the whole farm to fail or is it for connections failing for a single cache-server?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any good links to find more on the troubleshooting aspect of ACE ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shukla.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161395#M24060</guid>
      <dc:creator>shukla1975</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-22T08:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE :Transparent Cache-SP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161396#M24061</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shukla,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACE has a default idle timeout of 1hour for all traffic going through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is true with and without normalization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once the connection times out, it is being removed from the connection-list.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is where normalization makes a difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With normalization, a connection can only be established with a SYN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, when the application starts sending again, we do not allow the packets to go through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without normalization, any packet can be used to establish the connection, so when the server start sending data again, we re-establish the connection and allow the packets to go through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;L4 rejections occur when we can't find a server active - so the whole farm is down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:07:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161396#M24061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-24T10:07:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE :Transparent Cache-SP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161397#M24062</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Gilles, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; as per TAC its a single server and not the whole farm, im kinda still looking for confirmation as the whole farm failing will be catastrophic....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for normalization, for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my cache team says , the FTP starts with TCP and then for data transfer uses UDP, in this case ACE would drop the packet ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we configure application specific normalization parameters ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shukla. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-transparent-cache-sp/m-p/1161397#M24062</guid>
      <dc:creator>shukla1975</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-31T19:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

