<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSM Connections failover within Sfarm between RIPs in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252514#M25962</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I know stateful connections failover is supported between redundant CSM modules. Is it also supported between 2 RIPs within a sfarm. i.e while an active connection session is being served by real server 1 and for some reason it malfunction, will the session be taken over by the 2nd real in sfarm or will it be dropped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can connection failover within sfarms be configured with policy, if at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kashi_login</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-10T23:57:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSM Connections failover within Sfarm between RIPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252514#M25962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know stateful connections failover is supported between redundant CSM modules. Is it also supported between 2 RIPs within a sfarm. i.e while an active connection session is being served by real server 1 and for some reason it malfunction, will the session be taken over by the 2nd real in sfarm or will it be dropped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can connection failover within sfarms be configured with policy, if at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252514#M25962</guid>
      <dc:creator>kashi_login</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-10T23:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSM Connections failover within Sfarm between RIPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252515#M25963</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;how do you expect a TCP connection to be transfered from one server to the other ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about sequence number ? ports ? 3-way handshake ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the CSM everything is possible, but backend servers can't start tcp connection in the middle of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the answer is no.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:15:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252515#M25963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-11T05:15:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSM Connections failover within Sfarm between RIPs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252516#M25964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the clarification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/csm-connections-failover-within-sfarm-between-rips/m-p/1252516#M25964</guid>
      <dc:creator>kashi_login</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-11T12:41:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

