<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACE vs CSS in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271428#M26432</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just my $.02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No new features on the CSS, at all. Even the 8.X code is farily old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE has all the new features and any development.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE doesn't require an additional card / license for SSL. Somewhat easier to confgure the SSL features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note the ACE module does not do the HTTP acceleration. The 4710 does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware wise the 4710 is about comperable to just better than the 11503 in *most* categories, the 11506 has more horsepower on a number of things, but costs near 4 times as much as a 4710.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE comes with 5 contexts + admin, finally you dont have to fool around with the management interface and asymetrical routing. Having a lab ACE is easy, just put it in another context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE compression and HTTP acceleration are awesome features that are fairly easy to get functional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cabling, the CSS uses a lot of fiber (some copper capabilities). The ACE is all copper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mherald</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-16T19:21:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE vs CSS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271424#M26428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My customer has CSS11503's and is looking deploy more LB Services which would probably mean buying more units. I am trying to build up a case for deploying an ACE bundle. Is there anything on CCO that makes a tabular comparison between the products ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am pushing ACE as Cisco's Data Center strategic product in this area, but the obvious question from my customer is how come CSS is still out there ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271424#M26428</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilAstbury</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-02T11:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE vs CSS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271425#M26429</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSS is still there because there are still features that only exist in this hardware - like http insert of client certificate information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is no new features coming out for the CSS.  It is currently in maintenance mode only. No new development.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271425#M26429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-02T11:34:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE vs CSS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271426#M26430</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, thanks for your response.  So it seems like the way to go is ACE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see the ACE does SSL offloading - does this come bundled or does an additional license need to be purchased ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also - does the ACE have any ability to handle certificates ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:12:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271426#M26430</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilAstbury</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-02T13:12:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE vs CSS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271427#M26431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you get basic SSL functionalities without a license and can upgrade to get more TPS if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by handle certificates ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can create keys and CSR on ACE itself and have them signed by a CA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You then have to install the certificate on the ACE itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can also have chaingroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can do client certificate authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271427#M26431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-02T13:44:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE vs CSS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271428#M26432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is just my $.02&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No new features on the CSS, at all. Even the 8.X code is farily old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE has all the new features and any development.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE doesn't require an additional card / license for SSL. Somewhat easier to confgure the SSL features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note the ACE module does not do the HTTP acceleration. The 4710 does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardware wise the 4710 is about comperable to just better than the 11503 in *most* categories, the 11506 has more horsepower on a number of things, but costs near 4 times as much as a 4710.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE comes with 5 contexts + admin, finally you dont have to fool around with the management interface and asymetrical routing. Having a lab ACE is easy, just put it in another context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE compression and HTTP acceleration are awesome features that are fairly easy to get functional.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cabling, the CSS uses a lot of fiber (some copper capabilities). The ACE is all copper.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-vs-css/m-p/1271428#M26432</guid>
      <dc:creator>mherald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-16T19:21:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

