<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic rserver failures in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/rserver-failures/m-p/1346752#M28016</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When we do sh serverfarm we get the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm     : abc-http, type: HOST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; total rservers : 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ---------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                                ----------connections-----------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       real                  weight state        current    total      failures &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   ---+---------------------+------+------------+----------+----------+---------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   rserver: abc_136.39&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       167.238.136.39:0      8      OPERATIONAL  2          121        13&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   rserver: abc_136.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       167.238.136.40:0      8      OPERATIONAL  0          41         8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody happen to know if the failures mean the rserver was not accessable from the ACE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks... &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-16T01:02:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rserver failures</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/rserver-failures/m-p/1346752#M28016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When we do sh serverfarm we get the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm     : abc-http, type: HOST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; total rservers : 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ---------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;                                                ----------connections-----------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       real                  weight state        current    total      failures &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   ---+---------------------+------+------------+----------+----------+---------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   rserver: abc_136.39&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       167.238.136.39:0      8      OPERATIONAL  2          121        13&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   rserver: abc_136.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       167.238.136.40:0      8      OPERATIONAL  0          41         8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody happen to know if the failures mean the rserver was not accessable from the ACE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks... &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/rserver-failures/m-p/1346752#M28016</guid>
      <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-16T01:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rserver failures</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/rserver-failures/m-p/1346753#M28017</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Normally, this is when the ACE has had a problem with the backend server connection.  For SSL connections, if the initial handshake fails.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The connection failures counter increments only if the ACE attempts to load balance a connection and the ACE does not receive a SYN-ACK from the real server in response to a SYN or if the real server responds to the SYN with a RST.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:53:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/rserver-failures/m-p/1346753#M28017</guid>
      <dc:creator>wong34539</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-21T12:53:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

