<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balance LNS in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215524#M2869</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should be fine, as long as the vserver is set for UDP and the proper port.  That version of CSM code is not very recent.  Version 2.2(8) may be better.  I would not upgrade unless you hit a specific bug, unless you are just putting this into QA or other test environment.  Upgrading is always harder after it goes live.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UDP support started in version 2.1 so you may be fine either way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:46:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stevehall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-16T22:46:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balance LNS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215523#M2868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone configured CSM (Content Switching Module) on Catalyst 6513 to load balance LNS (L2TP Tunnel Server) as described in Figure-6 from &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns341/ns396/ns301/ns242/networking_solutions_white_paper09186a0080108939.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns341/ns396/ns301/ns242/networking_solutions_white_paper09186a0080108939.shtml&lt;/A&gt; ? My Catalyst 6513s are running Native IOS 12.1(11b)E4 and CSMs are running software 2.2(2a). I have tested successfully for telnet service but not for L2TP (UDP 1701).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215523#M2868</guid>
      <dc:creator>yongl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-16T07:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balance LNS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215524#M2869</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should be fine, as long as the vserver is set for UDP and the proper port.  That version of CSM code is not very recent.  Version 2.2(8) may be better.  I would not upgrade unless you hit a specific bug, unless you are just putting this into QA or other test environment.  Upgrading is always harder after it goes live.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UDP support started in version 2.1 so you may be fine either way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:46:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215524#M2869</guid>
      <dc:creator>stevehall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-16T22:46:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balance LNS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215525#M2870</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your suggestion. I have solved this problem by upgrading CSM software to 2.2(6).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balance-lns/m-p/215525#M2870</guid>
      <dc:creator>yongl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-17T02:37:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

