<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Clarification on results returned by polling 'slbVServerNumberOfConnections' snmp oid in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/clarification-on-results-returned-by-polling/m-p/1384944#M28809</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our testing team are currently load-testing a pair of Apache webservers sitting behind an ACE module (running A2.1.4) which is performing round-robin load balancing to the two boxes. Connection timeout values are default and server-side connection re-use is not enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using our network monitoring tool (SolarWinds Orion) I've configured a custom poller to poll the 'slbVServerNumberOfConnections' OID associated with the virtual server / VIP serverfarm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The test they are running is to introduce 10 virtual users every 10 seconds until 1200 users is reached with each user making a page request every 120 seconds in the 1st test, 150 in the second and 180 in the third.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/" /&gt;I've attached the graph of the results of the 3 tests below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The testing team expected each run to use progressivly less connections (as the time between page requests was increased) but each run appears almost identical from an ACE perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, even though the maximum number of virtual users was 1200 the maximum number of connections tops out at just over 2000?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm being asked to explain the results but I not too sure how to interpret them so any advice or insight would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bgfl-tech</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-26T12:02:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clarification on results returned by polling 'slbVServerNumberOfConnections' snmp oid</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/clarification-on-results-returned-by-polling/m-p/1384944#M28809</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our testing team are currently load-testing a pair of Apache webservers sitting behind an ACE module (running A2.1.4) which is performing round-robin load balancing to the two boxes. Connection timeout values are default and server-side connection re-use is not enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using our network monitoring tool (SolarWinds Orion) I've configured a custom poller to poll the 'slbVServerNumberOfConnections' OID associated with the virtual server / VIP serverfarm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The test they are running is to introduce 10 virtual users every 10 seconds until 1200 users is reached with each user making a page request every 120 seconds in the 1st test, 150 in the second and 180 in the third.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/" /&gt;I've attached the graph of the results of the 3 tests below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The testing team expected each run to use progressivly less connections (as the time between page requests was increased) but each run appears almost identical from an ACE perspective.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, even though the maximum number of virtual users was 1200 the maximum number of connections tops out at just over 2000?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm being asked to explain the results but I not too sure how to interpret them so any advice or insight would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matthew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/clarification-on-results-returned-by-polling/m-p/1384944#M28809</guid>
      <dc:creator>bgfl-tech</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T12:02:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clarification on results returned by polling 'slbVServerNumb</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/clarification-on-results-returned-by-polling/m-p/1384945#M28810</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First, verify your result with show command like 'show service-policy' and 'show conn', 'show resource usage'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, you may also need to capture sniffer traces to understand the traffic behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's sometimes interesting to see those traffic generator in action ....it's not always what we expect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sniffer tool will also perform some analysis and you can compare the sniffer results with ACE and the load generator.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/clarification-on-results-returned-by-polling/m-p/1384945#M28810</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-05T08:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

