<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CSS11500 Load Balancing issue in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408656#M29316</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Sergio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please elaborate on the issues you are experiencing? When you mention the VIP is not working as expected is that due to the fact that the connection simply hangs? Is the CSS actually balancing the inbound traffic?&amp;nbsp; Or is it successfully balancing the traffic, but not maintaining session persistence based on the server-side cookie?&amp;nbsp; Do you know if the session cookie will be embedded within the HTTP header or the URL string?&amp;nbsp; If you are unsure you can always change the "advanced-balance" method to "cookie-url". Can you ping the VIP address?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, can you confirm that the server-side cookie should be located directly after the following name "sap-hostid="?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ex:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sap-hostid=sapsrv1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason why I ask is you do not have a string skip-length defined so the CSS will attempt to locate the server-side cookie string after the prefix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, have you verified the services have passed their keep-alive check? This can be performed by running the following command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show service-summary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both of the services should "alive" on their keep-alive check.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, on your service configuration you do not require the "keepalive method get" command since the services are setup to perform a tcp socket connection for their keep-alive check and not a keepalive type of http to a URI page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;service SAPSRV1_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.44&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv1 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;service SAPSRV2_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.45&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv2 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, based on the service and content rule configuration it would seem as though your CSS has been deployed in Bridged Mode (single Circuit VLAN).&amp;nbsp; That being said, the Group Rule will allow users from the 192.215.13.0/24 network to establish a port 8000 connection to the 192.215.13.40 VIP. However, please be advised external clients establishing a connection to the 192.215.13.40 VIP will "appear" as the .40 VIP address within the destination server logs.&amp;nbsp; The CSS will SNAT the inbound client traffic and masquerade their true source address as the VIP. Unfortunately, the CSS does not support the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header option.&amp;nbsp; However, this can be bypassed through the use of ACLs on the CSS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jason&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jason.espino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-07T15:58:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSS11500 Load Balancing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408655#M29315</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I using the CSS 11500 sg0750004 (07.50.0.04) to balacing requests between two web application servers, but the after applied the configurations, the balancing requests don't occurs as expect, see the configuration applied:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: courier new,courier;"&gt;service SAPSRV1_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.44&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive method get&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv1 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: courier new,courier;"&gt;service SAPSRV2_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.45&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive method get&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv2 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: courier new,courier;"&gt;content SAPSRVS_8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; add service SAPSRV1_8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; add service SAPSRV2_8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vip address 192.215.13.40&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; advanced-balance cookies&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; string process-length 7 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; no persistent&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; port&amp;nbsp; 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; url "/*"&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; string prefix "sap-hostid="&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; string range 1 to 1999&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: courier new,courier;"&gt;group SAPSRV1_SAPSRV2Servers &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; add destination service SAPSRV1_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; add destination service SAPSRV2_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; vip address 192.215.13.40 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, the VIP Address is exclusively to the group service and the tcp port also is exclusively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please assist me, why the load balancing doesn't running correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Case need more information, please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advanced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sergio Lima&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408655#M29315</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergio Lima</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-07T11:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS11500 Load Balancing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408656#M29316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Sergio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you please elaborate on the issues you are experiencing? When you mention the VIP is not working as expected is that due to the fact that the connection simply hangs? Is the CSS actually balancing the inbound traffic?&amp;nbsp; Or is it successfully balancing the traffic, but not maintaining session persistence based on the server-side cookie?&amp;nbsp; Do you know if the session cookie will be embedded within the HTTP header or the URL string?&amp;nbsp; If you are unsure you can always change the "advanced-balance" method to "cookie-url". Can you ping the VIP address?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, can you confirm that the server-side cookie should be located directly after the following name "sap-hostid="?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ex:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sap-hostid=sapsrv1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason why I ask is you do not have a string skip-length defined so the CSS will attempt to locate the server-side cookie string after the prefix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, have you verified the services have passed their keep-alive check? This can be performed by running the following command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;show service-summary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both of the services should "alive" on their keep-alive check.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, on your service configuration you do not require the "keepalive method get" command since the services are setup to perform a tcp socket connection for their keep-alive check and not a keepalive type of http to a URI page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;service SAPSRV1_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.44&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv1 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;service SAPSRV2_8000 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.215.13.45&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; protocol tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive type tcp &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; keepalive frequency 30&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; port 8000&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; string&amp;nbsp; sapsrv2 &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, based on the service and content rule configuration it would seem as though your CSS has been deployed in Bridged Mode (single Circuit VLAN).&amp;nbsp; That being said, the Group Rule will allow users from the 192.215.13.0/24 network to establish a port 8000 connection to the 192.215.13.40 VIP. However, please be advised external clients establishing a connection to the 192.215.13.40 VIP will "appear" as the .40 VIP address within the destination server logs.&amp;nbsp; The CSS will SNAT the inbound client traffic and masquerade their true source address as the VIP. Unfortunately, the CSS does not support the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header option.&amp;nbsp; However, this can be bypassed through the use of ACLs on the CSS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Jason&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408656#M29316</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason.espino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-07T15:58:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS11500 Load Balancing issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408657#M29317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I review configurations applied on my CSS around the string and, observe that some errors. I reconfigure this and have success.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, I gonna review the all configurations applied on some services to check faults.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As soon as possible, I pass to you the information requested.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11500-load-balancing-issue/m-p/1408657#M29317</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergio Lima</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-07T17:37:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

