<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CPU Calculation in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28666#M299</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What formula/calculation does Cisco use on the content switches for CPU Utilization? Our switches show 100% utilization, but the switches seem to be functioning normally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 02:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bjames</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-11-02T02:24:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28666#M299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What formula/calculation does Cisco use on the content switches for CPU Utilization? Our switches show 100% utilization, but the switches seem to be functioning normally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 02:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28666#M299</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjames</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-02T02:24:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28667#M300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Funny you should mention that.  I'm checking in here to see if anyone's mentioned seeing CSS 11154's go to 100% CPU after being accessed with a browser to manage them rather than telnet.  Ours are running v5.005 &amp;amp; we just discovered this to be the case.  The switch doesn't "act" like it's at 100% - not sluggish to type on or sisplay commands via console or telnet, not enough connection activity to warrant it, etc.  I'm about to search the buglist then open a TAC case.  Maybe this is your issue, too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dennis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 09:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28667#M300</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwmcguire</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-02T09:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28668#M301</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dennis,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are 11050 switches running V.501, and we new the http sessions would increase CPU, but we see it at 100% even with Telnet, and they usually show 100% all the time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Performance seems fine though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2001 17:48:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28668#M301</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjames</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-02T17:48:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28669#M302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm, must be some other combination of events that's triggered the CPU display bug.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We actually tried v5.02 awhile ago but it also had a CPU display bug, something to do with the way VRRP was being handled.  Maybe the bug also exists in 5.01... are these redundant boxes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:34:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28669#M302</guid>
      <dc:creator>dwmcguire</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-05T14:34:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28670#M303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dennis,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The boxes are not in redundant mode right now. Both display the 100% Utilization issue, even when telneted in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm sure it's a bug, but a Cisco SE will be coming in this week and he will have a look at it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will let you know the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28670#M303</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjames</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-05T15:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Calculation</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28671#M304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a known bug.  It is fixed in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WebNS 5.02Build 3: ap0502003 (on CCO) - I tried it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on a CSS11800 and it worked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2001 12:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cpu-calculation/m-p/28671#M304</guid>
      <dc:creator>b59048</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-12-04T12:29:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

