<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574969#M32243</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;done!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio Romano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-08T07:24:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574958#M32232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to balance L3 (routing) traffic using a cisco ace 4710 appliance with a "A3(2.5)" system version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My rserver are some BlueCoat Proxy-SG in "proxy-transparent" mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is:&amp;nbsp; is cisco ACE able to balance basic L3 traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed this tutorial found on docwiki.cisco.com, but i cannot solve my problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_One_Arm_Mode_with_Source_NAT_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example"&gt;http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Basic_Load_Balancing_Using_One_Arm_Mode_with_Source_NAT_on_the_Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_Configuration_Example&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;can someone help me?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574958#M32232</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-20T20:11:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574959#M32233</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you attach your config so we can see what you have done and if there is something wrong ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574959#M32233</guid>
      <dc:creator>david.stout</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-21T10:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574960#M32234</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so, follow there is the configuration i've applied on the ACE:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list VLAN-2 line 8 extended permit ip any any&lt;BR /&gt;access-list VLAN-3 line 8 extended permit ip any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rserver host Server-A&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.6.132&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; probe testa-tcp-Server-A&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;BR /&gt;rserver host Server-B&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.6.133&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; probe testa-tcp-Server-B&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;BR /&gt;rserver host Server-C&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.6.134&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; probe testa-tcp-Server-C&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm host serverefarm-TRANSPARENT-PROXY&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; rserver Server-A&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; rserver Server-B&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; rserver Server-C&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-all vip-prova-transpa&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 2 match virtual-address 192.168.6.78 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map type loadbalance first-match policy-transparent&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; class class-default&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; serverfarm serverefarm-TRANSPARENT-PROXY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map multi-match bilancia-transparent&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; class vip-prova-transpa&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; loadbalance vip inservice&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; loadbalance policy policy-transparent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 2&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.6.70 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; alias 192.168.6.72 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; peer ip address 192.168.6.71 255.255.255.224&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; access-group input VLAN-532&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; service-policy input bilancia-transparent&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; no shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 3&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.6.130 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; alias 192.168.6.129 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; peer ip address 192.168.6.131 255.255.255.240&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; access-group input VLAN-3&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; no shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the router has got as nex-hop the vip created with the class-map named "vip-prova-transpa"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the service policy is active and the Vserver IP (192.168.6.78) is issued but it doesn't seem to receive the L3 traffic from router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank-You for every answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio Romano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574960#M32234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-03T16:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574961#M32235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Giorgio,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems to me you are trying to do transparent load-balancing in a wrong way. With this config the ACE is expecting traffic destined to VIP 192.168.6.78. However, the concept of transparent LB is based on the fact the you have to load-balance connection to any destination. Therefore, what you actually need is a "catch-all" VIP:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map match-all vip-prova-transpa&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 2 match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, the serverfarm needs to be trasparent (ACE should not change the destination IP to the rserver IP):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm host serverefarm-TRANSPARENT-PROXY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; transparent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should also point your router to the ACE alias address 192.168.6.72 on vlan2. You might also need to enable mac-sticky on your interfaces and some other features depending on your L2 topology and design requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ivan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574961#M32235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Kovacevic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-03T22:48:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574962#M32236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ivan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As soon as possible I'm gonna apply your configuration to the ACE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll keep you posted.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:37:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574962#M32236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-04T11:37:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574963#M32237</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the ACE config.&amp;nbsp; If two transparent proxies are used behind the ACE bridging two vlans, how do you prevent spanning-tree from blocking one port and have traffic flowing through both proxies? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574963#M32237</guid>
      <dc:creator>wshuffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-05T13:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574964#M32238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACE is not bridging the two vlans&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574964#M32238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Kovacevic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-05T13:08:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574965#M32239</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ivan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it works, but in the class-map named "vip-prova-transpa" I had to enter the string "0.0.0.0" in virtual ip-address mask field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;without this string it doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank-you very much ivan!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio Romano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:48:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574965#M32239</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T08:48:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574966#M32240</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah, my mistake... "match virtual-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" is correct config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am glad it is working now. Please mark the thread as "Answered".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574966#M32240</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Kovacevic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T09:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574967#M32241</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am confused about the subnet masks he used on the two vlans.&amp;nbsp; We are trying to do this with a /24 network.&amp;nbsp; The client will be 192.168.200.10 and have to pass throught the ACE -&amp;gt; Proxy -&amp;gt; 192.168.200.1 (gateway).&amp;nbsp; Did he just pick 2 subnet masks that are inside of the /24 subnet? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574967#M32241</guid>
      <dc:creator>wshuffman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T12:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574968#M32242</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case the ACE is in routed mode, and we could use any IP addresses on it's interfaces (like 1.1.1.1 and 10.10.10.10).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In your case, if all the devices need to be L2 between the client and the DG, then ACE needs be in bridged mode. The config stays as it is shown above (with my corrections), except the interface part:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface vlan 2
&amp;nbsp; bridge-group 1
&amp;nbsp; access-group input VLAN-532
&amp;nbsp; service-policy input bilancia-transparent
&amp;nbsp; no shutdown

interface vlan 3
&amp;nbsp; bridge-group 1
&amp;nbsp; access-group input VLAN-3
&amp;nbsp; no shutdown

interface bvi 1
&amp;nbsp; ip address 192.168.200.x 255.255.255.0
&amp;nbsp; no shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, real server IPs also need to be from 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now for all this to work, we need to do a trick: for the clients, the DG needs to be the ACE BVI address 192.168.200.x. This is because the clients need to send the packet with the destination MAC address of the ACE. After that ACE creates a connection and load-balances the packet to one of the proxy-servers and send the packet with destination MAC address of the proxy-server where the connection is load-balanced. After this the transparent proxy-server should do it's thing and forward the packet with the destination MAC address of the real DG 192.168.200.1. During whole this process packet's source and destination IPs are unchanged.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:36:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574968#M32242</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Kovacevic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T19:36:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco ACE: Basic L3 load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574969#M32243</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;done!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Giorgio Romano&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/cisco-ace-basic-l3-load-balancing/m-p/1574969#M32243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giorgio Romano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-08T07:24:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

