<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625022#M32973</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what about using cookie insertion with the browser-expire parameter enabled ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Surya ARBY</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-01T06:44:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP ports</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625018#M32969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if anybody has encountered or worked with Cisco ACE 4710 and following scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACE is configured with one virtual ip, for load balancing of a single server on different unique TCP ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its just like loadbalancing 2 physical servers but only difference being here the ip is common for 2 physical servers, but we are hosting the application on Two TCP ports using Apache on the Application server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are experiencing Application logout issues as the moment ACE tries load balancing to the 2nd entry of server, clients are logged out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Topology&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Client --------------------------Firewall----------------------ACE----------------------Single Server ( 10.1.1.1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ACE virtual ip &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.1.1.10- port 80,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;default L7 load balancing &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.1.1.1 port 2222- inservice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.1.1.1 port 2333- inservice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625018#M32969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T06:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625019#M32970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you try to configure stickyness, this will force a client to connect to the same server as where he connected on before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assign sticky resources to your context, configure a sticky serverfarm and configure that sticky serverfarm in your policy-map.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that doesn't work, capture the client traffic and see what is happening.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To make sure, at this point your should config looks like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rserver server1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; ip address 10.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;serverfarm farm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; rserver server1 2222&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; rserver server1 2333&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; inservice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dario&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625019#M32970</guid>
      <dc:creator>dario.didio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T07:16:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625020#M32971</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks dario.....i will try that, will post back on the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625020#M32971</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T08:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625021#M32972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Hi Dario,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Sticky configuration did not work, for some reason the ACE 4710 load balancer is still trying to loadbalance the traffic for single session as well. Either the server or the ACE are not retaining the connection state.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;sticky http-cookie COOKIETEST&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; timeout 1440&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; replicate sticky&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; serverfarm TESTSERVERFARM&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 8 static cookie-value "F0123" rserver TESTSERVER 8001&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 16 static cookie-value "F4567" rserver TESTSERVER 8002&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Policy-map type loadbalance first-match testtraffic&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; class class-default&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sticky-serverfarm COOKIETEST&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #f7fafb;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Client logs in and is&amp;nbsp; suppose to retain the session for one server on 8001 but some how during&amp;nbsp; his session, one request lands on the other server at 8002 and&amp;nbsp; subsequently he is logged out.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:14:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625021#M32972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-01T06:14:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625022#M32973</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what about using cookie insertion with the browser-expire parameter enabled ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625022#M32973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Surya ARBY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-01T06:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625023#M32974</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes Surya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately it still trying to establish session with the server on the 8002 port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Session persisitence is not working with this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 09:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625023#M32974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-01T09:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625024#M32975</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok this is clear now.....sticky persistence is acheived.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625024#M32975</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spawn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T17:28:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Loadbalancing with Single Server and 2 different TCP por</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625025#M32976</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;how did you solve the issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:50:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-loadbalancing-with-single-server-and-2-different-tcp-ports/m-p/1625025#M32976</guid>
      <dc:creator>Surya ARBY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T21:50:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

