<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233982#M3302</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, I've got a tac case open so I'll let you know how I get on.  I'm not doing url rewrite on the SCA in fact the only difference is the ssl being terminated on the onboard engine instead of the SCA.  Traces have shown time waits over 2 seconds with the onboard, but time waits have also been seen with the SCA but only up to 2 secs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 18:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tim.pearce</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-05-19T18:26:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233975#M3295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've migrated SSL from 2 SCA's load balnced with a CSS11503 to just the CSS with the onboard encryption engine and have noticed increased latency when the initial ssl connection is set up.  The configuartion hasnt changed apart from the SSL config.  Once the session is up it seems ok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 03:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233975#M3295</guid>
      <dc:creator>tim.pearce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T03:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233976#M3296</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks like I spoke too soon, some clients have been reporting pages not found after negotiating an SSL session.  The main problem though is the server seeing timeout errors from clients probably due to the latency with using the on board SSL.  I've had to revert back to using the SCA's which run fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;**SSL PROXY LIST &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ssl-proxy-list ssl-proxy-list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 cipher rsa-with-rc4-128-md5 10.117.247.40 1040 weight 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 cipher rsa-with-3des-ede-cbc-sha 10.117.247.40 1040 weight 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 cipher rsa-with-rc4-128-sha 10.117.247.40 1040 weight 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 cipher rsa-export-with-rc4-40-md5 10.117.247.40 1040&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 rsacert secure-ass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ssl-server 40 rsakey secure1024-ass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;***SERVICE &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service ssl_negotiate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  type ssl-accel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  slot 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  add ssl-proxy-list ssl-proxy-list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type none&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_1_commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_1_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_1_redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  type redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_1_tpw_sc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  string ujcs228b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  type redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_1_tpw_sc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.93&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  string u6ci2g8b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 81&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  type redirect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service web_2_tpw_sc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  ip address 10.117.246.94&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive type tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  keepalive port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  string ufm3r34m&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;************ OWNER &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;owner www&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    url "//www.website.com/*"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_1_commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_2_commercial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content http_to_https&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_1_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_2_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    url "//secure.website.com/*"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content https_to_http&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 1040&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    url "//www.website.com/*"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_1_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_2_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content ip_match&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 80&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    url "/*"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_1_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_2_http(s)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content tpw_ssl_local&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service ssl_negotiate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 443&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    application ssl&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content transactional&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.117.247.40&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    url "//secure.website.com/*"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    advanced-balance cookies&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_1_tpw_sc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service web_2_tpw_sc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 1040&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    string prefix "JSESSIONID"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    string skip-length 29&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    string process-length 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    string range 1 to 200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 14:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233976#M3296</guid>
      <dc:creator>tim.pearce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-10T14:14:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233977#M3297</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With just the configuration, there really isn't a good way to determine the cause of the delay or page not found. For that you should probably get sniffer traces and possibly ssldump. Are you using urlrewrite on the SCA? There might be other issues due to idle flows, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 20:49:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233977#M3297</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-17T20:49:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233978#M3298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;may you try to disable the TCP Nagle, choos the SSL unclean-shutdown, enable the Keepalive Mode für HTTP Sessions on your Server and try to vary with the ssl-qeue Delay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your Clients are microsoft, disable the TCP Nagle on both sides.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Enable the unclean Shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alter the SSL-Queue Delay to 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 10:42:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233978#M3298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sbutzek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-19T10:42:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233979#M3299</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help me please?. I am having problem with my content engine after an upgrade. The pages seems to be very slow openning up and the performance is unbearable very slow. please would you know why this is occurring?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 11:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233979#M3299</guid>
      <dc:creator>anthony.ezewele</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-19T11:47:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233980#M3300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There really isn't enough information to go on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may need to look at sniffer traces to determine the problem. Generally that is what we do to determine the cause of delays. The main cause is generally due to slowness or non response from the server in the CE to server connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should open a TAC case for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael Voight&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 16:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233980#M3300</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-19T16:09:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233981#M3301</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There really isn't enough information to go on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may need to look at sniffer traces to determine the problem. Generally that is what we do to determine the cause of delays. The main cause is generally due to slowness or non response from the server in the CE to server connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should open a TAC case for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael Voight&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 16:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233981#M3301</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvoight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-19T16:09:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233982#M3302</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, I've got a tac case open so I'll let you know how I get on.  I'm not doing url rewrite on the SCA in fact the only difference is the ssl being terminated on the onboard engine instead of the SCA.  Traces have shown time waits over 2 seconds with the onboard, but time waits have also been seen with the SCA but only up to 2 secs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 18:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233982#M3302</guid>
      <dc:creator>tim.pearce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-19T18:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233983#M3303</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco came back with the altering the queue delay to 0 which seemed to do the trick SSL was much quicker.  Testing went ok but in production we still saw some clients on dialup getting page not founds or the server thinking that the client had ended the session.  This behaviour is not seen when introducing the SCA's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try disabling Nagle and enabling unclean shutdown.  Many thanks for the post sorry I havent been able to get back to the board earlier.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233983#M3303</guid>
      <dc:creator>tim.pearce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-05T19:51:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from SCA1 to CSS onboard SSL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233984#M3304</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is also a bug fixed in 7.20 405 where the backendconnection gets passed in cleartext to the client.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This occurs only, when the TCP Port of your Contentrule does not match the Service Port you configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sven Butzek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 06:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/migration-from-sca1-to-css-onboard-ssl/m-p/233984#M3304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sbutzek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-06T06:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

