<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ACE modules reloaded in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670539#M33701</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As César said, it will be good to check the #show version command to determine what the reason was, it will give you the root fhe reboot exactly, in case it says: unknown, please take into consideration there are some bugs considered "silent bugs" which might trigger this type of behavior, depending on the reason of the reboot it will possible to need either an upgrade or a hardware replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jorge Bejarano</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-16T05:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670533#M33695</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI Experts, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had some issue with Datacentre ACE modules. Both primary and DR ACE modules got restarted in 16 hours difference. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately Syslog was not configured on the ACE and local logging got cleared after restart. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current IOS version is A2(3.2). The modules uptime was around 300 Days. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the log from 6509 switch during the restart &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Primary DC 6509-1 &lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 18:52:05.383 WAT: %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 10 18:56:47.291 WAT: %SNMP-5-MODULETRAP: Module 9 [Down] Trap&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 18:56:47.127 WAT: %OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 9, is being power-cycled off (Reset - Module Reloaded During Download) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 18:56:47.271 WAT: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 9 set off (Reset - Module Reloaded During Download) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 18:57:00.951 WAT: %OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 9, is being power-cycled off (Module not responding to Keep Alive polling) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 18:57:00.951 WAT: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 9 set off (Module not responding to Keep Alive polling)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 19:01:57.172 WAT: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 9: Running Minimal Diagnostics... &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 10 19:01:59.256 WAT: %SNMP-5-MODULETRAP: Module 9 [Up] Trap &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 19:01:58.700 WAT: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 9: Passed Online Diagnostics &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 10 19:01:59.256 WAT: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 9, interfaces are now online &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 10 19:02:04.548 WAT: %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;DR DC 6509-1 &lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.759: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to administratively down .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.763: %SNMP-5-MODULETRAP: Module 9 [Down] Trap&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 11 09:42:05.763: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.599: %OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 9, is being power-cycled off (Reset - Module Reloaded During Download)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.747: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 9 set off (Reset - Module Reloaded During Download) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.767: %LINK-SP-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to administratively down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:05.771: %LINEPROTO-SP-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to down .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:14.535: %SVCLC-5-SVCLCNTP: Could not update clock on the module 9, rc is -1 &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:19.395: %OIR-SP-3-PWRCYCLE: Card in module 9, is being power-cycled off (Module not responding to Keep Alive polling) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:42:19.395: %C6KPWR-SP-4-DISABLED: power to module in slot 9 set off (Module not responding to Keep Alive polling) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:15.819: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 9: Running Minimal Diagnostics... .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:19.871: %MLS_RATE-4-DISABLING: The global switching mode is now 'truncated'. Disabling the Layer2 Rate Limiters. .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:19.903: %SNMP-5-MODULETRAP: Module 9 [Up] Trap Jul 11 09:47:19.633: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 9: Passed Online Diagnostics Jul 11 09:47:19.905: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 9, interfaces are now online .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:21.079: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to administratively down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:20.912: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:21.080: %LINK-SP-5-CHANGED: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to administratively down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 11 09:47:25.039: %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;.Jul 11 09:47:25.047: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to up&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:24.520: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to down &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:25.056: %LINK-SP-3-UPDOWN: Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to up &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Jul 11 09:47:25.060: %LINEPROTO-SP-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1, changed state to up &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me did anyone face this issue before or is it any known BUG?﻿&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 05:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670533#M33695</guid>
      <dc:creator>aslamta123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T05:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670534#M33696</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Do you have any events in the "show diagnostic events module 9"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670534#M33696</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marko Leopold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T07:21:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670535#M33697</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Mark, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply, Here is the show diag output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REC-DCD-6509-1#sh diagnostic events module 9&lt;BR /&gt;Diagnostic events (storage for 500 events, 44 events recorded)&lt;BR /&gt;Event Type (ET): I - Info, W - Warning, E - Error&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Time Stamp&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ET [Card] Event Message&lt;BR /&gt;------------------ -- ------ --------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;09/03 02:57:19.510 I&amp;nbsp; [9]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Diagnostics Passed&lt;BR /&gt;07/10 18:56:48.035 E&amp;nbsp; [9]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; TestAsicSync Failed&lt;BR /&gt;07/10 19:01:58.696 I&amp;nbsp; [9]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Diagnostics Passed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aslam&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 07:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670535#M33697</guid>
      <dc:creator>aslamta123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T07:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670536#M33698</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Aslam,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any core dump file generated due to the reload? use "dir core:" command to check and compare the time stamp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case you have copy them out the box using copy core: command, then open a TAC case and attach them to the case for further analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case core files were not generated, then you dont have much information to check the root cause and you need to make sure that you have syslog enabled on your ACE so you can collect all needed information to troubleshoot the issue in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahmad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670536#M33698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ahmad Basel Jaber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T09:31:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670537#M33699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hello Aslam!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had the same ASIC failure with reboot on our ACE modules before (see my CSC thread #2037058) and support advised us to open a TAC case and to RMA the module. We did this, in case it was a productive enviroment there. Maybe you can check it and wait for the failure to happen again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marko&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:44:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670537#M33699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marko Leopold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T09:44:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670538#M33700</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Aslam, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the last reboot reason in your ACE???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can check that with the show version command&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 02:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670538#M33700</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cesar Roque</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-16T02:57:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670539#M33701</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As César said, it will be good to check the #show version command to determine what the reason was, it will give you the root fhe reboot exactly, in case it says: unknown, please take into consideration there are some bugs considered "silent bugs" which might trigger this type of behavior, depending on the reason of the reboot it will possible to need either an upgrade or a hardware replacement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670539#M33701</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jorge Bejarano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-16T05:18:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE modules reloaded</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670540#M33702</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI All, Thanx for the help. Got the resaon from show version output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffff00; color: #ff0000;"&gt;last boot reason:&amp;nbsp; NP 1 Failed : SRAM Parity Error Chan 3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffff00; color: #ff0000;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: Calibri; color: #003366;"&gt;Also got the TAC comment on SRAM party error &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: Calibri; color: #003366;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The SRAM parity error presented in the core file is not due to a software issue.&lt;BR /&gt;The issue is the result of a "bit-flip" within the SRAM itself which can occur as a&lt;BR /&gt;result of environmental conditions. This "bit-flip" is rectified by a simple reboot of&lt;BR /&gt;the system, which would occur with the generation of the core file. Cisco internal&lt;BR /&gt;testing and customer experience has shown that these types of issues can occur&lt;BR /&gt;with very low frequency, but do not required an RMA of the device.&lt;BR /&gt;If there are multiple instances of this issue on the same module, a proactive RMA/EFA&lt;BR /&gt;of the device would be in order.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ACE is susceptible to this because of the way it uses SRAM to store control information&lt;BR /&gt;and packet data as opposed to scratch-pad storage. Almost any 1-bit flip will be detected as a&lt;BR /&gt;parity error. Cisco has recognized the issue and is taking action to ensure this will not be&lt;BR /&gt;an issue on the next generation of the ACE module. The next generation module design&lt;BR /&gt;and timeline is currently under review.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thnx again for the help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aslam&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:52:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-modules-reloaded/m-p/1670540#M33702</guid>
      <dc:creator>aslamta123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-18T07:52:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

