<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Load Balancing File Shares in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balancing-file-shares/m-p/1671825#M33719</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shady, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You dont need sticky feature here, since i am assuming all the shares will have all the files, you can have two files sharing servers, and a simple loadbalacing would work in your case. Provided you have setup a replication across the shares and maintain the same data across both of them . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abijith Sharma V S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>asharmav</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-14T20:39:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing File Shares</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balancing-file-shares/m-p/1671824#M33718</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a client who has an application that includes file shares.&amp;nbsp; I've never heard of anyone need to load balance files shares, but I'm thinking if this is something we want to do we would need sticky configured or maybe a primary secondary type configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any gotcha's regarding file shares and load balancing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:36:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balancing-file-shares/m-p/1671824#M33718</guid>
      <dc:creator>shday</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-30T14:36:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing File Shares</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balancing-file-shares/m-p/1671825#M33719</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Shady, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You dont need sticky feature here, since i am assuming all the shares will have all the files, you can have two files sharing servers, and a simple loadbalacing would work in your case. Provided you have setup a replication across the shares and maintain the same data across both of them . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abijith Sharma V S&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/load-balancing-file-shares/m-p/1671825#M33719</guid>
      <dc:creator>asharmav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-14T20:39:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

