<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Attaching service-policy to the ACE module in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675457#M33764</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok, thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it have any influence on the ACE's performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is more recommended by Cisco regarding best practices?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lukaszkhalil</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-27T13:38:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching service-policy to the ACE module</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675455#M33762</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got confused when I was reading the ACE module config guide. In the part regarding the service-policy attachment there is information that &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The ACE allows only one policy of a specific feature type to be activated on a given interface", so I understand it as that I am not allowed to attach two LB service-polices to the same interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I moved further I found an example, where two LB service-policies are applied to the same interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;policy-map multi-match LB-TRAFFIC-80&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;class VIP-ACCESS-MANAGER-80&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance vip inservice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance policy POLICY-ACCESS-MANAGER-80&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance vip icmp-reply active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;policy-map multi-match LB-TRAFFIC-ANY&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;class VIP-ACCESS-MANAGER-ANY&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance vip inservice&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance policy POLICY-ACCESS-MANAGER-ANY&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;loadbalance vip icmp-reply active&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;interface vlan 758&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;description CLIENT-SIDE-VLAN&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;bridge-group 100&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;access-group input ALL&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;service-policy input LB-TRAFFIC-80&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;service-policy input LB-TRAFFIC-ANY&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;no shutdown&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question is, which statement is true and is recommended by the best practices ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for any help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lucas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675455#M33762</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszkhalil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T07:48:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching service-policy to the ACE module</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675456#M33763</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Lucas, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The documentation is a bit misleading on that point. What this phrase refers to is to those policy types that are mutually exclusive. In reality, this just applies to the management policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For multi-match policies, it is allowed to have several applied on the same interfaces. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675456#M33763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Arrondo Ostiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-20T09:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching service-policy to the ACE module</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675457#M33764</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ok, thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it have any influence on the ACE's performance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which one is more recommended by Cisco regarding best practices?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675457#M33764</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszkhalil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-27T13:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching service-policy to the ACE module</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675458#M33765</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Lukas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both options are equivalent, so, I don't think there is any official recommendation for one or the other. Personally, I think the best approach is using one multi-match policy per vlan with all the classes in there, because this way the configuration is quite easy to read. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675458#M33765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Arrondo Ostiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-29T09:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching service-policy to the ACE module</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675459#M33766</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/attaching-service-policy-to-the-ace-module/m-p/1675459#M33766</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszkhalil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-29T09:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

