topic SIP (Compact Form) in Application Networking https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/sip-compact-form/m-p/1696198#M34074 <P>Hello!!</P><P></P><P>A customer wants to configure SIP in the LB, but we noticie that their handsets use the abbreviated form of common header fields. Does the ACE supports the compact form of SIP?? We will use the sticky feature for the requests.</P><P></P><P>Thanks!</P> Tue, 17 May 2011 03:28:14 GMT krinlaurek 2011-05-17T03:28:14Z SIP (Compact Form) https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/sip-compact-form/m-p/1696198#M34074 <P>Hello!!</P><P></P><P>A customer wants to configure SIP in the LB, but we noticie that their handsets use the abbreviated form of common header fields. Does the ACE supports the compact form of SIP?? We will use the sticky feature for the requests.</P><P></P><P>Thanks!</P> Tue, 17 May 2011 03:28:14 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/sip-compact-form/m-p/1696198#M34074 krinlaurek 2011-05-17T03:28:14Z Re: SIP (Compact Form) https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/sip-compact-form/m-p/1696199#M34075 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi Ivan,</P><P></P><P>Rfc states the following:</P><P></P><P>"A header field name MAY appear in both long and short forms within the same message.&nbsp; Implementations MUST accept both the long and short forms of each header name."</P><P></P><P>So i would expect ACE to support the abbreviated form as well. Are you facing some issues?</P><P></P><P>Thanks,</P><P></P><P>Olivier</P></BODY></HTML> Wed, 18 May 2011 13:25:09 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/sip-compact-form/m-p/1696199#M34075 ohynderi 2011-05-18T13:25:09Z