<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ACE Jumbo frames in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774249#M35271</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can look here!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/security/guide/tcpipnrm.html#wp1070115"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/security/guide/tcpipnrm.html#wp1070115&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marko Leopold</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-18T07:44:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774243#M35265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know ACE support Jumbo frames, But do we see any issue of using jubmo frames like resource consuming and etc?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also to enable , MTU command needs to be issued in Gloabal level or Interface level?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774243#M35265</guid>
      <dc:creator>syakshanulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-10T23:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774244#M35266</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jumbo frames must be configured using the 'mtu' command at interface level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding resource usage jumbo frames can have an effect on the resource usage if you use L7 load-balancing, if only due to the higher throughput. There should not be any unexpected resource usage. Of course try to test this before using it in production...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards, Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:55:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774244#M35266</guid>
      <dc:creator>pevaneyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-16T09:55:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774245#M35267</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Peter, I am having ACE Module and running on Bridge mode so i am assuming Jumbo frames should be configured under BVI Interface or Vlan interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering is it really required in ACE to cofnigure Jumbo frames when MSFC configured with Jumbo frames?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if we dont configure Jumbo in ACE and when MSFC (Cat6K) configured with Jumbo frames, will it cause any performance issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774245#M35267</guid>
      <dc:creator>syakshanulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-16T14:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774246#M35268</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to configure the larger MTU on the vlan interfaces. The BVI is only there to configure the IPs used by the ACE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please do read the note related to the L7 policies at:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/vA4_1_0/configuration/rtg_brdg/guide/vlansif.html#wp1007281"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/vA4_1_0/configuration/rtg_brdg/guide/vlansif.html#wp1007281&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do not configure the vlan interfaces of the ACE to use a higher MTU it can drop unexpected jumbo packets. The sender might start resending traffic with a lower packet size, but not all systems do this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards, Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774246#M35268</guid>
      <dc:creator>pevaneyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-16T15:28:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774247#M35269</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; And i guess you should increase the TCP buffer size too. Because you have increased packet size you need an increased buffer too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774247#M35269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marko Leopold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-17T09:41:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774248#M35270</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Marko.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to increase TCP buffer size and is it really compulsory to do that when we implement Jumbo frames?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:08:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774248#M35270</guid>
      <dc:creator>syakshanulla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-17T15:08:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774249#M35271</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can look here!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/security/guide/tcpipnrm.html#wp1070115"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/v3.00_A1/configuration/security/guide/tcpipnrm.html#wp1070115&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774249#M35271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marko Leopold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-18T07:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774250#M35272</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Setting the mss advertised by the ACE with "&lt;STRONG style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;set tcp mss max" &lt;/STRONG&gt; is actually more important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise the systems will not take advantage of the bigger mss if the ACE is doing anything at L7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to the higher transfer speeds indeed you should investigate if you need to increase the tcp buffer from the default of &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;32768 bytes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards, Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774250#M35272</guid>
      <dc:creator>pevaneyn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-18T07:59:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACE Jumbo frames</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774251#M35273</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other suggestion? we had a similiar problem and our Tcp buffer has been increased already.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;A href="http://www.acoolme.com"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: white;"&gt;acoolme&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-jumbo-frames/m-p/1774251#M35273</guid>
      <dc:creator>alexgeaney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-01T22:10:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

