topic Re: CSS11501 Box-to-Box redundancy link in Application Networking https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-box-to-box-redundancy-link/m-p/248358#M3572 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hey,</P><P></P><P>Its not possible to have more than one link as cross over cable in Box to Box <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:">😞</span></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P><P>Sagar</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:55:33 GMT sagdas 2004-07-15T18:55:33Z CSS11501 Box-to-Box redundancy link https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-box-to-box-redundancy-link/m-p/248357#M3571 <P>We have configured box-to-box redundancy and it works fine. However, it seemed to fall squarely on a single point of failure - the heartbeat link between the 2 CSS. </P><P></P><P>Could we have more than 1 physical crosscable connection between the 2 CSS? </P> Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:46:10 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-box-to-box-redundancy-link/m-p/248357#M3571 wong.kenneth 2004-07-15T12:46:10Z Re: CSS11501 Box-to-Box redundancy link https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-box-to-box-redundancy-link/m-p/248358#M3572 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hey,</P><P></P><P>Its not possible to have more than one link as cross over cable in Box to Box <span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:">😞</span></P><P></P><P>Regards,</P><P>Sagar</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:55:33 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-box-to-box-redundancy-link/m-p/248358#M3572 sagdas 2004-07-15T18:55:33Z