<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ace 4710 - same context routed and load-sharing in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885312#M36690</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe I misunderstood your question, but I don't see any possible problem here. Any context (talking about L3 mode, otherwise not clear what "routed" means) can perform basic L3 routing. If you add some VIPs - it will loadbalance traffic coming to them, however you will still be able to access servers via they real IPs directly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if I misunderstood you or you have some particular scenario&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Borys Berlog</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-17T13:24:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ace 4710 - same context routed and load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885311#M36689</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can an ACE 4710 have , in the same context - servers which are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. just being routed to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. a set of load-shared servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been told you may not be able to do this on this version&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if this is correct&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885311#M36689</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve switzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-17T10:11:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ace 4710 - same context routed and load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885312#M36690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe I misunderstood your question, but I don't see any possible problem here. Any context (talking about L3 mode, otherwise not clear what "routed" means) can perform basic L3 routing. If you add some VIPs - it will loadbalance traffic coming to them, however you will still be able to access servers via they real IPs directly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if I misunderstood you or you have some particular scenario&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885312#M36690</guid>
      <dc:creator>Borys Berlog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-17T13:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ace 4710 - same context routed and load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885313#M36691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi Boris &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been on the ACE course and before we install the 4700 box i have been &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;asked to set up a test setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would involve have a context which would have one ip address range and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a few pcs (pretending to be servers ) and one which would be just routed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A colleague of mine seemed to think that something had been said on the course&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to the effect that if the ACE was deployed&amp;nbsp; in line the you couldnt have some&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;of your servers in load-sharing and some just routed on the same subnet and &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the same context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ace-4710-same-context-routed-and-load-sharing/m-p/1885313#M36691</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve switzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-18T10:02:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

