<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSS11501-C0 X CSS11501-L0 in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-c0-x-css11501-l0/m-p/1917501#M37009</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; The "L0" and "C0" just indicate different hardware revisions. Both models are the same from the operational point of view, and fully compatible with each other. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:08:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Arrondo Ostiz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T13:08:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSS11501-C0 X CSS11501-L0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-c0-x-css11501-l0/m-p/1917500#M37008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have a CSS11501 C0 in production and, as it is EOS, we got a CSS11501 L0 to replace it in case it breaks. Does anyone know if there is any compatibility issues between them? Will it work if I take a backup from one device and copy in the second one? I am not in measure to do a lab test right now to solve my doubts...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:35:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-c0-x-css11501-l0/m-p/1917500#M37008</guid>
      <dc:creator>wbarboza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-04T15:35:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CSS11501-C0 X CSS11501-L0</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-c0-x-css11501-l0/m-p/1917501#M37009</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; The "L0" and "C0" just indicate different hardware revisions. Both models are the same from the operational point of view, and fully compatible with each other. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:08:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css11501-c0-x-css11501-l0/m-p/1917501#M37009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel Arrondo Ostiz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-08T13:08:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

