<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is the ACE load Balancing correctly or is there an issue? in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712789#M42829</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had an e-mail from our Web team admin with a graph stating that there is an issue with the load balancing configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We've got two front end servers&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;SDHSPWFE01, and&amp;nbsp;SDHSPWFE02.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;According to the graph below, they can see http and https traffic hitting&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.6666669845581px;"&gt;SDHSPWFE01 which is the green line. However,&amp;nbsp;SDHSPWFE02 is the black line which is constantly on zero.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've had a look at the Datacentre context and ran the following commands:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:9px;"&gt;ACE-CR1-LOADBALANCER/Datacentre# sh stats loadbalance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:9px;"&gt;+------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;+------- Loadbalance statistics -----------+&lt;BR /&gt;+------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total version mismatch &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 decisions &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 2540&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 rejections &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 decisions &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 40621&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 rejections &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 LB policy misses &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 LB policy misses &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total times rserver was unavailable &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total ACL denied &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total IDMap Lookup Failures &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Misc Errors &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Cipher Lookup Failures &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Msg sent to Optimization &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Direct Msg received from Optimization &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Indirect Msg received from Optimization: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Optimization Msg sent to Real Servers &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've ran many show commands and have a great deal of output, but was wondering if there is a specific one I can use to pin point if this is an ACE/Configuration issue or a server issue?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Leastcount Predictor and sticky when configuring hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/media/lbg.png" class="migrated-markup-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>haidar_alm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-02T08:09:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is the ACE load Balancing correctly or is there an issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712789#M42829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had an e-mail from our Web team admin with a graph stating that there is an issue with the load balancing configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We've got two front end servers&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;SDHSPWFE01, and&amp;nbsp;SDHSPWFE02.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;According to the graph below, they can see http and https traffic hitting&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14.6666669845581px;"&gt;SDHSPWFE01 which is the green line. However,&amp;nbsp;SDHSPWFE02 is the black line which is constantly on zero.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've had a look at the Datacentre context and ran the following commands:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:9px;"&gt;ACE-CR1-LOADBALANCER/Datacentre# sh stats loadbalance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:9px;"&gt;+------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;+------- Loadbalance statistics -----------+&lt;BR /&gt;+------------------------------------------+&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total version mismatch &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 decisions &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 2540&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 rejections &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 decisions &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 40621&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 rejections &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer4 LB policy misses &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Layer7 LB policy misses &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total times rserver was unavailable &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total ACL denied &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total IDMap Lookup Failures &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Misc Errors &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Cipher Lookup Failures &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Msg sent to Optimization &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; : 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Direct Msg received from Optimization &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Indirect Msg received from Optimization: 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Total Optimization Msg sent to Real Servers &amp;nbsp;: 0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've ran many show commands and have a great deal of output, but was wondering if there is a specific one I can use to pin point if this is an ACE/Configuration issue or a server issue?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are using Leastcount Predictor and sticky when configuring hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/media/lbg.png" class="migrated-markup-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 08:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712789#M42829</guid>
      <dc:creator>haidar_alm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T08:09:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Haider,If it hasn't been</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712790#M42830</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Haider,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it hasn't been taken care of yet, then do "show serverfarm &amp;lt;serverfarm name&amp;gt; detail" and see if there are any connections being forwarded to &lt;SPAN style="font-size:11pt"&gt;SDHSPWFE02. You can also see what is the status of this server, inservice or probe failed etc. May be that this server is out of service and hence no requests are being sent to it. ACE will take the server out of LB rotation if it is in PROBE_FAILED state or OUT OF SERVICE.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:11pt"&gt;I would start checking from there.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:11pt"&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:11pt"&gt;Kanwal&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size:11pt"&gt;Note: Please mark answers if they are helpful.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 02:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712790#M42830</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kanwaljeet Singh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-08T02:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you're using sticky based</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712791#M42831</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're using sticky based on source, is the source address the same for multiple clients (proxy maybe or some other server)? Perhaps you have stickiness working against you in some way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could also try "show conn serverfarm &amp;lt;serverfarm name&amp;gt;" and see if there is some kind of pattern&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2015 06:28:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/is-the-ace-load-balancing-correctly-or-is-there-an-issue/m-p/2712791#M42831</guid>
      <dc:creator>TIM JUDGE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-09T06:28:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

