<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Same issues. any updates on in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785063#M43771</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Same issues. any updates on this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am opening a TAC case on this as our client is using WAAS for SMB only and has been waiting for signing support for ages.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wonder if it is fully optimizing SMB signed traffic and just not reporting the acceleration type correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David Shaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-07T17:28:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WAAS 6.1.1 vs SMB signed traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785061#M43769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, i have a problem with SMB signed traffic after upgrading our lab WAAS devices to the latest 6.1.1 version of IOS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When testing the SMB traffic (client: Win7, server: Win2008 R2) I don't see the "X" flag (SMB signed connection). SMB signature is enabled on both client and server (enabled, not required on client's side; enabled and required on the server's side) also WAAS devices have the SMB signing enabled.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just for the clarification: traffic seems to be accelerated/optimized just fine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;this is what i usually get when trying SMB (accessing shared folders):&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: terminal, monaco, monospace;"&gt;D:DRE,L:LZ,T:TCP Optimization RR:Total Reduction Ratio&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: terminal, monaco, monospace;"&gt;A:AOIM,C:SMB,E:EPM,G:GENERIC,H:HTTP,I:ICA,M:MAPI,N:NFS,S:SSL,W:WAN SECURE,&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;X: SMB&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: terminal, monaco, monospace;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt; Signed Connection&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;,s:SSL Interposer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: terminal, monaco, monospace;"&gt;ConnID &amp;nbsp; Source IP:Port &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Dest IP:Port &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;PeerID Accel RR &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: terminal, monaco, monospace;"&gt; 6032 192.168.21.10:2955 192.168.11.10:445 c0:8c:60:8b:c8:b6 &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;TCDLW&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; 39.2%&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cisco documentation says very little about the latest version 6.1.1 (in general) so I was wondering if someone else&amp;nbsp;has yet experienced the same/similar issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We didn't have this problem before the upgrade though (we were running v 5.5.1 previously).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785061#M43769</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrej cambal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-14T16:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Andrej,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785062#M43770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Andrej,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WAAS Developers are working in some similar behaviors which are caused by some new software defects. Is it possible to open a TAC case to track this down?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jorge&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;Please, rate answers!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:35:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785062#M43770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jorge Bejarano</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-10T22:35:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Same issues. any updates on</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785063#M43771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same issues. any updates on this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am opening a TAC case on this as our client is using WAAS for SMB only and has been waiting for signing support for ages.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wonder if it is fully optimizing SMB signed traffic and just not reporting the acceleration type correctly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/waas-6-1-1-vs-smb-signed-traffic/m-p/2785063#M43771</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Shaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-07T17:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

