<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP route-cache flow over WCCP in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519283#M48675</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response and I have worked with TAC , it was identified as bug &lt;SPAN style="mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; : ; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; sans-serif&amp;quot;: ; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #000000; font-size: 11pt; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; , &amp;quot;: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; Calibri&amp;quot;: ; "&gt;CSCti86131.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vsraghav123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-22T08:31:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP route-cache flow over WCCP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519281#M48673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I have a query , we have enabled ip route cache flow on the main ATM IMA interface and we have few subinterfaces configured in it.While looking at the output of ip cache flow I see the source IP add &amp;amp; source interfaces to be different i.e. in the below example 172.18.96.0/22 is a subnet which resides behind AT0/IMA0.75 but I see this subnet as a source / destination IP through a different sub-interfaces.As per the network setup there is no other link for the other sub-interfaces to reach the mentioned subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;below is one sample output , we see lot of traffic as highlighted below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;AT0/IMA0.776&amp;nbsp; 172.18.96.115&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi0/0.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 172.18.9.64&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 06 047D 0882&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1 - In this example the mentioned IP should not reflect the source interface as Ima.776 rather it should b only IMA.75 as below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AT0/IMA0.75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 172.18.96.115&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gi0/0.1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 172.18.9.64&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 06 047D 0887&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1 - this is right information&lt;BR /&gt;AT0/IMA0.779&amp;nbsp; 172.18.11.15&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; AT0/IMA0.75&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 172.18.96.186&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 06 0CF6 0050&amp;nbsp; 1 - this is right inforamtion &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;configurations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;interface ATM0/IMA0&lt;BR /&gt;no ip address&lt;BR /&gt;ip route-cache flow&lt;BR /&gt;logging event subif-link-status&lt;BR /&gt;load-interval 30&lt;BR /&gt;ima clock-mode common 0&lt;BR /&gt;ima differential-delay-maximum 150&lt;BR /&gt;atm vc-per-vp 1024&lt;BR /&gt;no atm ilmi-keepalive&lt;BR /&gt;end&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;we have these many subinterfaces.ATM0/IMA0.75 is the connection to hub site and the rest are the spoke sites connecting to this router lastly this router is the only transit to reach the hub router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;ATM0/IMA0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATM0/IMA0.75&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATM0/IMA0.775&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATM0/IMA0.776&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATM0/IMA0.777&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATM0/IMA0.779&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No routing issues as the route table looks completly good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And today I disbaled WAAS ,removed WCCP redirect statement and the traffic flow was normal , would like to know why we see this kind of traffic flow&amp;nbsp; ? Moreover we have seen this kind of traffic flow&amp;nbsp; in different routers as well the common thing on all these routers are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Common physical link binded with multiple sub-interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. WCCP enabled&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. IOS 12.4 25c&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if anyother information is required ..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519281#M48673</guid>
      <dc:creator>vsraghav123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-26T12:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP route-cache flow over WCCP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519282#M48674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a bit of a theory, but I have an explanation if you have the WAE configured for "Egress-Method Negotiated-Return"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that case the WAE returns the packet to the router in a GRE tunnel that has a destination IP of the Router ID IP.&amp;nbsp; The GRE header is removed, then the router does a route lookup for the inside (true source IP) next hop interface.&amp;nbsp; It then re-injects that traffic onto that interface and the packet is processed normally,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or even more simply, is AT0/IMA0.776 the interface connected to the WAE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519282#M48674</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Jardin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-16T15:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP route-cache flow over WCCP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519283#M48675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response and I have worked with TAC , it was identified as bug &lt;SPAN style="mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; : ; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; sans-serif&amp;quot;: ; mso-ascii-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #000000; font-size: 11pt; mso-hansi-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; , &amp;quot;: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; Calibri&amp;quot;: ; "&gt;CSCti86131.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:31:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ip-route-cache-flow-over-wccp/m-p/1519283#M48675</guid>
      <dc:creator>vsraghav123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-22T08:31:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

