<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Box to box redundancy in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43953#M489</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using more then one link for your heartbeat or redundancy-protocol link is not supported and quite honestly will not work properly anyway simply due to some bridging holes that needed to be put into the code to avoid dropping VRRP frames with a CSS 11000 MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pete Knoops&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pknoops</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-09-24T10:18:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Box to box redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43952#M488</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to configure more then one redundancy link in a box to box redundancy ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43952#M488</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmendes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T07:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Box to box redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43953#M489</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using more then one link for your heartbeat or redundancy-protocol link is not supported and quite honestly will not work properly anyway simply due to some bridging holes that needed to be put into the code to avoid dropping VRRP frames with a CSS 11000 MAC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pete Knoops&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Systems&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43953#M489</guid>
      <dc:creator>pknoops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T10:18:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Box to box redundancy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43954#M490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Pete&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/box-to-box-redundancy/m-p/43954#M490</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmendes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-09-24T11:38:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

