<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic how to modify my wccp load-balance in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462856#M49263</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've two WAE in my core, 612 (10.99.100.95) and 674 (10.99.100.96)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and 3750 stack is my core switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list 1 l2-redirect l2-return mask-asign in both WAE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and wccp load balance is work fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but in my environment ip subnet, like 10.10.10.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.10.10.1 ~ 10.10.10.128 will load balance in WAE-612&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and 10.10.10.128 ~ 10.10.10.255 will load balance in WAE-674&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I want to reverse it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I try to change WAE ip address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it still haven't change&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone could help me ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chia hao chang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-22T04:36:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>how to modify my wccp load-balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462856#M49263</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've two WAE in my core, 612 (10.99.100.95) and 674 (10.99.100.96)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and 3750 stack is my core switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I configured wccp tcp-promiscuous router-list 1 l2-redirect l2-return mask-asign in both WAE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and wccp load balance is work fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but in my environment ip subnet, like 10.10.10.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.10.10.1 ~ 10.10.10.128 will load balance in WAE-612&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and 10.10.10.128 ~ 10.10.10.255 will load balance in WAE-674&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I want to reverse it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I try to change WAE ip address&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it still haven't change&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone could help me ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462856#M49263</guid>
      <dc:creator>chia hao chang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-22T04:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to modify my wccp load-balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462857#M49264</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no reliable way to accomplish what you are asking.&amp;nbsp; The bucket allocation is done on a best effort basis, so even if we could swap the buckets, there is no guarantee they would stay that way over time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best approach here is to modify the WCCP mask to get a better distribution of load across the WAAS devices.&amp;nbsp; You mention in your post that these two devices are part of your "core".&amp;nbsp; Are there any clients located at the same site with these devices, or are all of the connections being initiated from outside this location?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462857#M49264</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zach Seils</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-22T11:04:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to modify my wccp load-balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462858#M49265</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I disable WCCP and waitting for all connection gone in WAE-674&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and enable WAE-674 WCCP to join WCCP group again&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it's strange&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAE-674 starts taking over the connections from WAE-612&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like WAE-612 have 800 connection and WAE-674 have 400 connections before&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when WAE-674 rejoin to WCCP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WAE-674 have 800 connections and WAE-612 have 400 connections now&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know why this principle but this is user's desire&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm confuse@@&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462858#M49265</guid>
      <dc:creator>chia hao chang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-30T03:12:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: how to modify my wccp load-balance</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462859#M49266</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This isn't necessarily a problem.&amp;nbsp; WCCP uses a hash table of 256 buckets to distribute traffic across the devices in a service group.&amp;nbsp; When you have two devices in the service group, each one gets 50% of the buckets (i.e. WAE1 gets buckets 0-127 and WAE2 gets buckets 128-255).&amp;nbsp; When a device leaves the service group, the buckets it was allocated are reassigned to the remaining device in the service group.&amp;nbsp; When a device is added to the service group, it will get 50% of the buckets, but it's not guaranteed that it will get the same 50% it previously had.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in your case, when the 674 rejoined the service group, it's possible that it was allocated the buckets that the 612 was previously handling the 800 connections on.&amp;nbsp; This is normal behavior and not anything to be alarmed about.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/how-to-modify-my-wccp-load-balance/m-p/1462859#M49266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zach Seils</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-01T11:48:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

