<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ipanema solution vs WAAS in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830582#M50686</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach, can you please elaborate on what do you mean by the "application visibility"? We have always looked at the WAAS solution for application acceleration and WAN optimization. Also, it would be a tall order to have a customer purchase both, ipanema and WAAS. Is there a white paper depicting the shortcomings and the superior feature of both products? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks again...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-05T15:20:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ipanema solution vs WAAS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830579#M50683</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anybody have some kind of a comparison study between the Cisco's WAAS solution and ipanema?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830579#M50683</guid>
      <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-04T15:33:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipanema solution vs WAAS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830580#M50684</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We find that customers can use ipanema and WAAS as complimentary solutions, leveraging ipanema for application visibility and WAAS for optimization and acceleration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830580#M50684</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zach Seils</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-05T04:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipanema solution vs WAAS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830581#M50685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach, thanks...Is there any kind of white paper describing the synergies between the two?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks again...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830581#M50685</guid>
      <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-05T15:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipanema solution vs WAAS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830582#M50686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach, can you please elaborate on what do you mean by the "application visibility"? We have always looked at the WAAS solution for application acceleration and WAN optimization. Also, it would be a tall order to have a customer purchase both, ipanema and WAAS. Is there a white paper depicting the shortcomings and the superior feature of both products? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks again...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830582#M50686</guid>
      <dc:creator>axfalk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-05T15:20:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipanema solution vs WAAS</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830583#M50687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greg,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have seen customers using ipanema for per-application traffic reporting, and in some cases, QoS enforcement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, but we don't have any papers available at this point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:01:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/ipanema-solution-vs-waas/m-p/830583#M50687</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zach Seils</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-05T21:01:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

