<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CSS 11501 spanning-tree question in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-11501-spanning-tree-question/m-p/332188#M5458</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the bridge priority mentioned in the 2nd command is actually the port-priority which has a value between 0-250 while the true bridge priority configured outside of the interface has a value from 0 - 65535.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following info from the CSS CLI clearly indicates the command 'bridge priority' on the interface is actually a confusing name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GILLES(config-if[ 2/1])# bridge priority ?    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;INTEGER&gt;           Port spanning-tree priority (command is renamed to port-priority)&lt;/INTEGER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see the command was renamed port-priority but the old command is still present.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 06:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-10-08T06:20:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSS 11501 spanning-tree question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-11501-spanning-tree-question/m-p/332187#M5457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a CSS 11501 and am confused about the documentation on spanning -tree&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco says the CSS has a default priority of 32768 according to this example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801ee706.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801ee706.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but in this example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a00801e16c7.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a00801e16c7.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;they state that the default bridge priority for a interface/vlan pair (on a trunk)is 128 !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does cisco differentiate between the default, out-of-the box spanning-tree setting and do they use a different default-value for spanning-tree regarding trunks ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radboud&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-11501-spanning-tree-question/m-p/332187#M5457</guid>
      <dc:creator>smc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-06T13:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS 11501 spanning-tree question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-11501-spanning-tree-question/m-p/332188#M5458</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;the bridge priority mentioned in the 2nd command is actually the port-priority which has a value between 0-250 while the true bridge priority configured outside of the interface has a value from 0 - 65535.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following info from the CSS CLI clearly indicates the command 'bridge priority' on the interface is actually a confusing name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GILLES(config-if[ 2/1])# bridge priority ?    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  &lt;INTEGER&gt;           Port spanning-tree priority (command is renamed to port-priority)&lt;/INTEGER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see the command was renamed port-priority but the old command is still present.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 06:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-11501-spanning-tree-question/m-p/332188#M5458</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-10-08T06:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

