<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CSS not LB to available RDP services  in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373816#M6451</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the initial config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All services active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;owner PMN-RS-term &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content PMN-RS-RDP &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term01 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term02 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term03 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term04 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term05 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term06 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term07 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term08 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 3389 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term09 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term10 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term11 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term12 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term13 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term14 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term15 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term16 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term17 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term18 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term19 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    advanced-balance sticky-srcip &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    sticky-inact-timeout 128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow-inactive-timeout 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.10.225.67&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The recent config change has removed;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    advanced-balance sticky-srcip &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    sticky-inact-timeout 128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow-inactive-timeout 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in favor of;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow permanent port1 3389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance roundrobin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carl King</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-02T19:01:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSS not LB to available RDP services</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373815#M6450</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have 20 term servers behind a 11500 with RDP connection limits set to 4 because of heavy resource utilization on the application running there. With max connections at 6 the CSS could potentially go over but we thought it would distribute them more evenly. Instead it is overloading one server and leaving the remaining servers untouched.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far we have made a few changes to try to minimize the complexity of the config and still achievve our objective. We have dropped sticky sessions, changed LB to RoundRobin from least conn, and removed the flow-inactive timer and made it permanent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one troubleshooting scenario we had 5 people attempt connections to the VIP and each got a connection to service number 5 but the flows were not in the flow table and the CSS connection counters did not reflect 5 connections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen this before?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373815#M6450</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carl King</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-02T18:54:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS not LB to available RDP services</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373816#M6451</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is the initial config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All services active.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;owner PMN-RS-term &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  content PMN-RS-RDP &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term01 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term02 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term03 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term04 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term05 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term06 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term07 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term08 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    protocol tcp &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    port 3389 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term09 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term10 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term11 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term12 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term13 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term14 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term15 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term16 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term17 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term18 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term19 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    add service PMN-RS-term20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    advanced-balance sticky-srcip &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    sticky-inact-timeout 128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow-inactive-timeout 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    vip address 10.10.225.67&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    active &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The recent config change has removed;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    advanced-balance sticky-srcip &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    sticky-inact-timeout 128&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow-inactive-timeout 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance leastconn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in favor of;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    flow permanent port1 3389&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    balance roundrobin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373816#M6451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carl King</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-02T19:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS not LB to available RDP services</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373817#M6452</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How long ago did you make these changes?  Did you clear the sticky-table after you made them?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why did you make the RDP port (3389) permanent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~Zach&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373817#M6452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zach Seils</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-02T20:35:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CSS not LB to available RDP services</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373818#M6453</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We didn't explicitly clear the sticky table. We suspended the content rule and found the sticky table was empty when we looked at it after activating the rule again. Is that effectly the same?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The connections are coming in from call center reps who load a flaky 16bit Foxpro app from the terminal server. If the RDP session gets disconnected prematurely, the user cannot get back into the Foxpro application and the DB admins have to go into the FP server and manually clear their hung session each time. Permanent prevents the "post disconnect maintenance" issue. When they are finished for the day, they log off. We are forced to clear the flow tables late at night or early in the AM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A workaround for the stupid user syndrome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/css-not-lb-to-available-rdp-services/m-p/373818#M6453</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carl King</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-02T22:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

