<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: The concept of http persistent and non-persistent in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410097#M7322</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Persistent will use HTTP version 1.1 while non-persistent will use version 1.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use non-persistent only if your server does not support http version 1.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTTP method HEAD or GET is selected with the command 'keepalive method'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A head does not require the server to send us the content of the requested file, but simply an acknowledgement that the file is available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The GET will request the complete file from the server and the CSS will verify that the content did not change compare to first GET request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, I would recommend the default - head, unless you believe somebody could corrupt the content of your website.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:27:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-06-01T09:27:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The concept of http persistent and non-persistent</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410096#M7321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;pls somebody explain me the concept of "keepalive type http".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when and where configure the persistent and non-persistent? not clear from the doc that HTTP-head, HTTP-get, classA and classB.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 16:10:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410096#M7321</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjrchoi11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-31T16:10:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The concept of http persistent and non-persistent</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410097#M7322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Persistent will use HTTP version 1.1 while non-persistent will use version 1.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use non-persistent only if your server does not support http version 1.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTTP method HEAD or GET is selected with the command 'keepalive method'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A head does not require the server to send us the content of the requested file, but simply an acknowledgement that the file is available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The GET will request the complete file from the server and the CSS will verify that the content did not change compare to first GET request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, I would recommend the default - head, unless you believe somebody could corrupt the content of your website.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:27:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410097#M7322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T09:27:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The concept of http persistent and non-persistent</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410098#M7323</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot. some more basic questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q1) what's difference between persistent and non-persistent in the behavior perspective? ex, persistent trying keep continue keepalive into the http server? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q2) there are table explained the ClassA and B based on the keepalive type. why "http-head non-persistent" is classA versus classB for "http-persistent"? I want to understand relate to the operational behavior. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410098#M7323</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjrchoi11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T13:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The concept of http persistent and non-persistent</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410099#M7324</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm glad you asked the question.  I had to verify the behavior to be sure of my answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using persistent connections, the CSS only open 1 TCP connection, and it keeps it open for all keepalive HTTP requests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If using non-persistent, the CSS will open a new connection for every keepalive and close it after receiving the server response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gilles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 17:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410099#M7324</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gilles Dufour</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T17:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The concept of http persistent and non-persistent</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410100#M7325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Gilles. getting clear the "persistent" concept. I have an another basic question regards the load balancing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A.balance srcip(same src IP to the same service)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B.balance destip(same dest IP to the same service)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;C.balance roundrobin(evenly distribute)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q1) looks A is stick to specific service and analogue to "advanced-balance sticky-srcip". what's difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Q2) in C, what's decision mechanism(ex, source IP) to distribute evenly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/the-concept-of-http-persistent-and-non-persistent/m-p/410100#M7325</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjrchoi11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-01T18:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

