<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Terminal Server Load balancing in Application Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/terminal-server-load-balancing/m-p/73756#M882</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have implemented load balancing between 5 microsoft terminal servers. The problem is when I looked at the second server I see 5 people connected but from the CSS view there is only 2 people connected.  We tried this example with clearing counters on CSS and restarting all terminal servers to make sure everyone disconnected. After that again we check the statistics and nothing changed. For ex. Cisco shows 4 Microsoft shows 8. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All the statistic gathered by issuing sh service summary and sh summary are not accurate as Microsoft Terminal Server Manager. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What can be the problem? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be appreciated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 14:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>btimuralp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-10T14:19:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Terminal Server Load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/terminal-server-load-balancing/m-p/73756#M882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have implemented load balancing between 5 microsoft terminal servers. The problem is when I looked at the second server I see 5 people connected but from the CSS view there is only 2 people connected.  We tried this example with clearing counters on CSS and restarting all terminal servers to make sure everyone disconnected. After that again we check the statistics and nothing changed. For ex. Cisco shows 4 Microsoft shows 8. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All the statistic gathered by issuing sh service summary and sh summary are not accurate as Microsoft Terminal Server Manager. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What can be the problem? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be appreciated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 14:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/terminal-server-load-balancing/m-p/73756#M882</guid>
      <dc:creator>btimuralp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-10T14:19:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Terminal Server Load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/terminal-server-load-balancing/m-p/73757#M883</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I remember seeing a bug on some CSS versions (I don&amp;#146;t remember which).  Check with Cisco to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2002 20:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-networking/terminal-server-load-balancing/m-p/73757#M883</guid>
      <dc:creator>wdrootz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-16T20:55:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

