https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-software-discussions/alternative-to-cisco-catalyst-9000v-and-cisco-catalyst-8000v/m-p/5225523#M10657 <P>I've using EVE-NG but would like to know what is a good alternative to 9000v and 8000v image since its resource heavy image and I can't run multiple.</P><P>Also so far only found 9000v to allow &lt;switchport mode trunk&gt; command directly whereas IOSV L2 switch and like i86bi-linux-l2-adventerprise-15.1b for example will give the Command rejected: An interface whose trunk encapsulation is "Auto" can not be configured to "trunk" mode error.</P><P>Thanks in advance!</P> Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:16:57 GMT testeri1 2024-11-17T12:16:57Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-software-discussions/alternative-to-cisco-catalyst-9000v-and-cisco-catalyst-8000v/m-p/5225523#M10657 <P>I've using EVE-NG but would like to know what is a good alternative to 9000v and 8000v image since its resource heavy image and I can't run multiple.</P><P>Also so far only found 9000v to allow &lt;switchport mode trunk&gt; command directly whereas IOSV L2 switch and like i86bi-linux-l2-adventerprise-15.1b for example will give the Command rejected: An interface whose trunk encapsulation is "Auto" can not be configured to "trunk" mode error.</P><P>Thanks in advance!</P> Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:16:57 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-software-discussions/alternative-to-cisco-catalyst-9000v-and-cisco-catalyst-8000v/m-p/5225523#M10657 testeri1 2024-11-17T12:16:57Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-software-discussions/alternative-to-cisco-catalyst-9000v-and-cisco-catalyst-8000v/m-p/5225538#M10658 <P><SPAN>Not sure what is supported on this platform folks might know here&nbsp;</SPAN><A href="https://www.eve-ng.net/forum/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow noreferrer">https://www.eve-ng.net/forum/</A></P> Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:23:20 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/cisco-software-discussions/alternative-to-cisco-catalyst-9000v-and-cisco-catalyst-8000v/m-p/5225538#M10658 bigevilbeard 2024-11-17T13:23:20Z